+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 598 Green Liberalism voters.

93%
Yes
7%
No
87%
Yes
5%
No
6%
Yes, and exceed the guidelines and be the world leader in environmental standards
1%
No, come up with local solutions that work for each community
1%
No, increase sanctions on countries that are the top contributors of global pollution instead
0%
No, and the UN should be abolished

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 598 Green Liberalism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 598 Green Liberalism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Green Liberalism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @Brandonnoe84  from Colorado  answered…2mos2MO

No, come up with local solutions that work for each community, and increase sanction on countries that are the top contributors of global pollution instead.

 @9TD8FMRfrom British Columbia  answered…2mos2MO

Take it into consideration but every city is different and needs to also figure out whats best for that plot of land.

 @9RBXRKDfrom Nova Scotia  answered…4mos4MO

Every country should strive to follow and exceed environmental guidelines and high pollution countries should receive sanctions

 @9PSLGWZfrom Alberta  answered…5mos5MO

Yes, but the UN is not an organization worth treating as a benchmark for ethical or righteous standards.

 @9VF2RTRfrom British Columbia  answered…2mos2MO

Only if it makes sense based on our society needs and environmental guardianships and also financial support for the people

 @9TXBP2Yfrom British Columbia  answered…2mos2MO

Yes as a framework but also look at local needs and adopt additional measures, or equivalent alternatives if it makes more sense

 @9K6HR9Kfrom Ontario  answered…9mos9MO

No, this only subdues us and makes us only look more controlled to the weak jewish mindsetted and bankerist dogs while their cabinets reeks of dumb communistic idealized pigs who have nothing in common with anyone, total demolition is what we need for the headquarters and such as mass death.

 @9JV5LCX from New Brunswick  answered…9mos9MO

No, because not all countries have the same level of pollution nor production nor trees to compensate.
China, for example, is responsible for over 50% of all pollution and won't impose the same restrictions until 2060. We need manufacturing to return here to reduce pollution impacts due to global trades. impacts.