Statistics are shown for this demographic
Province/Territory
Electoral District (2013)
Electoral District (2011)
Response rates from 21.9k Economic Liberalism voters.
80% Yes |
20% No |
73% Yes |
15% No |
7% Yes, this is a well planned project that will provide significant social and economic benefits to the region |
4% No, not until all the Aboriginal bands this project affects agree to it |
1% No, Enbridge has a poor history of pipeline installations |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 21.9k Economic Liberalism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 21.9k Economic Liberalism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Economic Liberalism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@4R4XY7N4yrs4Y
I do not support it as a necessary act, but as an interesting idea. It is not essential to the succession of our nation, and if aboriginal groups do not support it, there is cultural interference happening. I am not supporting an act with the potential to create personal conflict.
@9W2PH892mos2MO
We should process oil in canada instead of shipping to foreign markets without environmental regulations
@9W2P3R62mos2MO
I would like to see this implemented but only if the government and the companies transporting the resources overseas can guarantee and follow through with their promise with yearly well-designed checks and public reports stating their success at transporting the resources with the least amount of environmental damage and no oil spills
@9WYDMSD1mo1MO
Yes, so long as private companies and contractors have no hand in it, we must nationalize our natural resources, we just must also do it efficiently and properly, which means keeping privately contracted public works companies and middle men out of it as well.
@9LN42DV8mos8MO
Yes, assuming all measures can be taken to ensure reduced impact on the environment and affected communities.
@9LJGNWT 8mos8MO
Yes, as long as the corporations building the pipeline and operating the pipeline have UNLIMITED LIABILITY and either sufficient assets or bonding in place to clean up an environmental disaster. If the cost of the potential loss or bonding is prohibitive, then this is a market force that will drive stakeholders to alternatives.
@9KTRK679mos9MO
No, bitumen should not be transported by ship especially in such a treacherous and sensitive environment
@9KBFTYW 9mos9MO
Yes, but only with agreements between all parties being formalized, including Aboriginal bands and strict penalties for non-adherence or future failures causing environmental harm or damage.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
