+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 462k Canada voters.

41%
Yes
59%
No
37%
Yes
48%
No
4%
Yes, this is a well planned project that will provide significant social and economic benefits to the region
9%
No, not until all the Aboriginal bands this project affects agree to it
3%
No, Enbridge has a poor history of pipeline installations

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 462k Canada voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 462k Canada voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Canada voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @4R4XY7Nfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

I do not support it as a necessary act, but as an interesting idea. It is not essential to the succession of our nation, and if aboriginal groups do not support it, there is cultural interference happening. I am not supporting an act with the potential to create personal conflict.

 @B23DHJVanswered…2wks2W

No And All Current Pipelines Should Be Shutdown And Removed And There Should Be A Complete Ban On Any New Pipelines

 @9W2PH89from British Columbia  answered…2mos2MO

We should process oil in canada instead of shipping to foreign markets without environmental regulations

 @9W2P3R6from British Columbia  answered…2mos2MO

I would like to see this implemented but only if the government and the companies transporting the resources overseas can guarantee and follow through with their promise with yearly well-designed checks and public reports stating their success at transporting the resources with the least amount of environmental damage and no oil spills

 @9WYDMSDfrom British Columbia  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, so long as private companies and contractors have no hand in it, we must nationalize our natural resources, we just must also do it efficiently and properly, which means keeping privately contracted public works companies and middle men out of it as well.

 @9LN42DVfrom Ontario  answered…8mos8MO

Yes, assuming all measures can be taken to ensure reduced impact on the environment and affected communities.

 @9LJGNWT from British Columbia  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, as long as the corporations building the pipeline and operating the pipeline have UNLIMITED LIABILITY and either sufficient assets or bonding in place to clean up an environmental disaster. If the cost of the potential loss or bonding is prohibitive, then this is a market force that will drive stakeholders to alternatives.

 @9KTRK67from British Columbia  answered…10mos10MO

No, bitumen should not be transported by ship especially in such a treacherous and sensitive environment