+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 122k Canada voters.

56%
Yes
44%
No
45%
Yes
38%
No
11%
Yes, but only for non-essential services
7%
No, but establish a labour court to preempt and mediate strikes

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 122k Canada voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 122k Canada voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Canada voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @4D4DL89from Manitoba  answered…4yrs4Y

No, most government workers are corrupt and lazy. They should be monitored 24/7 and fired if they aren't productive.

 @9D536B2from Quebec  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only for non-essential services. Essential services should have labour courts to mediate strikes.

 @8PS9XBVfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but they should stop whining and just work. The work will give them self satisfaction and possible reward. You're the one who needed a job, be grateful.

 @B49T48Vfrom Saskatchewan  answered…3wks3W

Yes but binding on third party arbitration should be an option available to force an end to strikes that go on too long.

 @B45T6JKfrom British Columbia  answered…4wks4W

Yes, but only for non-essential services And police officers and other essential workers should be paid a lot more

 @B3PYW9Cfrom Alberta  answered…1mo1MO

Yes they should—within reason. If strikes cause massive damage to a countries economy and infrastructure then there should be limits to strike duration and immediate action to encourage negotiations and mediation.

 @B35PD2Qfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

yes. Also if the government has to pass legislation putting workers back to work a separate "essential service" category should be added to the current "essential services".