Try the political quiz
+

Reply

 @4PGFBLBfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

No, the complete disregard which Bill C-51 displays for civil rights in the interest of averting 'terrorism' is an egregious example of self-fulfilling prophecy.

 @9ZZNB4NConservativefrom Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

I am a little torn about this question because of course I want myself and all of Canada protected from terrorism but there needs to be policies in place that protect Canadians rights to privacy. The government cannot just spy on their citizens without actual evidence.

 @4R4XY7Nfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

I do not support racial profiling and such (which is where many people would develop suspicion). As terrorism is increasing, I find it more important to support defence and preventive measures. The less fault we have is safest. Education is more important to support, and I am opposed to control at this chaotic time. Premature detaining would not stop extremist plans anyway, as I have noticed.

 @B4CW2BSfrom Ontario  answered…2wks2W

with regulations on protecting again discrimination like for example if your name sounds suspicious in the airport lines

 @B45RNV8from Ontario  answered…3wks3W

Yes, but don't give them too much power that they feel they can do anything without any consequences.

 @9MLXWMNfrom Ontario  answered…11mos11MO

Needs more clarification. Given the recent developments, I'm all for strengthening police and intelligence capabilities.

 @9MCJ3PYConservativefrom Ontario  answered…11mos11MO

Yes but this policiy made a lot of people way more racist towards muslims and middle eastern communities

 @9M3P8JHfrom Ontario  answered…12mos12MO

Yes for intelligence agencies but if we allowed polices there might be police violence and power abuse

 @9L57DMRfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

It’s a difficult question because I don’t want my privacy to be invaded but I don’t want any terrorism to happen

 @9D7KWCWfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes but increase screening and training to get rid of individuals that use or will use their power for malicious purposes.

 @B3MHVY7from Ontario  answered…1mo1MO

I dont have enough knowledge of this subject to have a proper opinion, but from the sounds of the organization's plans and ideas i would say i support it.

 @B397TW6from Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

Yes because I want that extra safety net, but also no because this could result in someone’s life being threatened and/or lost due to discrimination.

 @9ZZ6GJWfrom Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

As long as people's lives aren't monitered more than 50% of the time, it would be a safe bet to prevent potential terroist attacks.

 @9ZNXRCYfrom Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

I like the idea of the bill and what its trying to do, but without proper execution, this bill could start more problems

 @9WGYK7Rfrom Ontario  answered…6mos6MO

police should be smarter and more nice to others no matter what they like or dislike and support the community of the lesbian and gay and other types i'm not one of them i just support them.

 @9TP6Y52from Ontario  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, but not to a certain point. There just still be a point for arrests. It goes against Canada's values and our rights.

 @9SR7BTCfrom Ontario  answered…8mos8MO

i think we should protect our country from terrorism, but get rid of immagrints who want to build a new life

 @9RTLWCPIndependentfrom Ontario  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, I would support it, but it is a little too vague in some aspects, limit it to just intelligence agencies fighting terrorism, the local police shouldn't get involved with that. Provide more accountability. The bill needs more work

 @9RBWNKLfrom Ontario  answered…9mos9MO

Don’t have enough information on Bill C-51 to comment (and this kind of question sets it up as a “pro/con police” or “pro/con anti-terrorism” situation without context).

 @9QQVM6Kfrom Ontario  answered…9mos9MO

yes, I agree that expanding local police and intelligence agencies' authority to prevent terrorism is important, but there should be more regulations on what that would involve and that the power is balanced.

 @9JWMJCZ from Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

They should only do it when there's evidence about a terrorist attack is the only time they should expand local police and intelligence agencies' authority to prevent terrorism.

 @9J9LDD5 from Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

No, because it would make a way to accuse a certain group of people for terrorism when it is always done by others.

 @9HCSTN2from Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but the bill should be amended so that claims of terrorist activity are fully proven and that csis has absolute reasonable grounds and provable grounds to suspect someone of terrorism, and only with a permit or court order. Disrupting protests should also not be allowed.

 @9H9QP5Vfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Depends on whose being highered and how they are planning to control terroism but yes for the most part.

 @9H2DR3Tfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

even if it is good to prevent terrorism i still feel the sense of not being in my own private space when I'm alone

 @9GFVHJMfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

no because it bans certain firearms and they are not the problem the problem are the people using them and it also gives the government permission to censor stuff from us

 @9FNVPPVfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

Further intell is always helpful. Giving police too much power is not usually beneficial.

 @9FL7SJ9from Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

I believe that the bill has a great cause but it should have been more exact and if it risks the security of the people of Canada then it should not be done.

 @9FKR42XConservativefrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

yes, but only to a certian extent because if they have to much power it will be abused for the lesser.

 @9FD7JXTfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9CMNF9Yfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

I feel like instead of assuming every muslim is a terriost look at people who accually look like teriost or do a crimnal background check

 @9CLJFYRfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

I am currently unsure of the specifics of what Bill C-51 allows so I cannot say at this time what my stance is.

 @9C2536Nfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

It's not an issue in Canada I think so they can put money into it but not that much

 @9BKGN7Hfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

 @96J58QJfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but the bill isn’t specific on the accountability of the officers

 @96HJ2SSfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @968J6P9from Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @95QPHP6from Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @95QDFM3New Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @95CVK3Rfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

It depends. I think its okay if they have proof that this certain person might be involved in terrorism and not just dependent on their first and last name.

 @95CVJ66Conservativefrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @95CVC5Dfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @95CQ82Jfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Police need to be retrained before you can add any more to a system, especially involving people of other culture

 @93YVQ7KPeople’sfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

This could lead to a lot of racially profiling and people who don't support it.

 @93XBNXBfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @93VNXBJfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

no, I think the powers of police should be expanded to prevent terrorism but not much so that the state would not slip toward police state.

 @93THVTGfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes but only if there's proof to detain that person, if its judging based on how they look then no.

 @93S89Q4from Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only if there's proof to detain them, if its just because the way someone looks then no that is wrong.

 @93RYJLPfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @93RVS2Jfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

I say yes but at the same time it show that we are afraid of terrorism.

 @93RPFX5from Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @93R6N9ZLiberalfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

I'm worried racism may play a part in this, like they might target Muslims, islams, or Arabs.

 @93Q9YT5from Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

I do not support the provisions that support authority to gather intelligence, but I do support the amendments related to sexual assault.

 @939CGKFfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @93729NHfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only when local police and intelligence agencies' are proven not to be discriminatory and/or racist.

 @933T6Q9from Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes as long as it is not terrorism to Canadians.. Ie Canadians were called Terrrorist by Trudeau for standing up for our rights in Ottawa..

 @933BQJRfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9327BFNfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

This bill is necessary but not to be used in the way it is now (disproportionately affects Middle Easterns with racism and prejudice)

 @92FG9XQfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

yes but detaining suspects preemptively should require authorization from multiple government officials and convincing proof with sever penalties for detaining an innocent person.

 @926XCDDfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8ZT2X57Communistfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

100% ACAB. "terrorism" is not going to be where these agencies look. They are swamped with racists and this incentive will only harm marginalised groups and benefit those in power. The police and intelligence agencies have always been pets for the wealthy.

 @8ZMDCV6Liberalfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

I don't really support it as much just because we won't get our own privacy back but at the same time, it's for the best to prevent crime so Overall as long as the expansion isn't too big then I'm fine with that.

 @8ZBS5B8from Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8ZBLKX9from Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

No, I don't support how they determine terror suspects by racial profiling.

 @8ZBB68Kfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

No, it’s unnecessary spending and it could possibly lead to a police state

 @8Z8FH2Rfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8YVJ4HKfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but proper infrastructure should be put into place for it’s employees and ALL levels of command/management should be vetted, go through extensive anti-discrimination and have a certain level of education. At the same time, these positions should not be life-long, they should be open for input from Canadians and how they feel, and changes should be made accordingly.

 @8YM24WNLiberalfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

As long as they don't use the information collected to discriminate against ordinary citizens.

 @8YB8J6Nfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes but only if there are conditions to prevent its abuse and guarantees that it doesn't violate the Charter of Rights and Freedoms

 @8Y93KBYPeople’sfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

No, it is a slippery slope towards a police state

100% would be used as an excuse to spy on citizens.

 @8Y8W43Qfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes but only if protesting and other forms of peaceful retaliation are not considered acts of terror.

 @8XYTKJ2New Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8XR2ZQNfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only if they properly follow the Bill C-51, and if there isn't any abuse of power.

 @8XM4D4Xfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but this must be watched carefully by other authorities and must have feedback from the community.

 @8XLPWNNfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8TW7QR6Liberalfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TVD7ZTfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

No. Privacy is the most important aspect of a free society, and this bill limits that greatly.

 @8TS8XVKfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...