Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Electoral District (2011):

Electoral District (2013):

391 Replies

 @8CBVDPGfrom Alberta  answered…5yrs5Y

No, but have have police go through a most strict training and mental evaluation to determine their stability and ability to do their job without using bias

 @8HN74DBfrom Alberta  answered…5yrs5Y

id rather fund both

 @8Q2GXXRfrom Pennsylvania  agreed…4yrs4Y

Me too, but as conservatives I think we have to recognize the dangerous amounts of government spending. Name aspects that we should defund to get more funding into these areas, that's the key issue here.

 @8PHKCQJfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Funding for social and community based programs should be taken off the workload for police and given their own budget to provide services needed.

 @8Q2GXXRfrom Pennsylvania  agreed…4yrs4Y

The number of cops who want that is staggering. Imagine if you spent 50% of your day responding to mentally ill people and therefore having no time to fight or stop major violent crimes like armed robberies, stabbings and shootings. The problem is we are also asking for bodycams and more training, and that requires more funding, which we don't have.

 @8CRJFFBfrom Alberta  answered…5yrs5Y

More money should be spent on police rehabilitation and screening so police are better equipped and know what to do in certain situations

 @8C8JYY8from Alberta  answered…5yrs5Y

No but police need specialized training in mental health and more training in non-leathal force

 @9F9SY9Wfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but don't take only a portion of the funds instead of all or a big amount of it.

 @9F4F8G8from Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

No, but that funding should be lessened while being focused towards training, regulations, and removing corruption

 @9F42NPPfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

Depends on how effective and influential a social and community based programs are. It also depends on how much new technology and systems the local police need

 @9DKJPVNConservativefrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

No, but make sure that there are more types of professionals who can respond to critical situations without the need for fatal weaponry, but lean towards non-fatal defense tools like tasers & mace.

 @9CBTBW3from Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

Channel funds based on data collected regarding actual efficacy of reducing recidivism instead of current metrics.

 @B4NWTNKfrom Alberta  answered…3 days3D

we need the police, and if we can't figure out how we can balance the police funding and the funding of other programs, thinking that abolishing the police is a good idea is insane.

 @B4KQSJJfrom Alberta  answered…1wk1W

Do not defund the police, as every community needs law enforcement. Unthinkable crimes can occur regardless of available resources. If someone is intent on committing a crime, they will do so, regardless of the support they receive early on. While it is important to invest in community safety programs to foster a secure environment, police remain essential for when things go wrong. Unfortunately, we do not live in a perfect world.

 @B4H5T5Zfrom Alberta  answered…2wks2W

More police with better mental health training and higher wages for social workers to accompany the police.

 @B4GF4CSfrom Alberta  answered…2wks2W

No, funding should social and community based programs should be done in coordination with police services.

 @B4FM9XBfrom Alberta  answered…2wks2W

Both should be increased, and eventually decrease the police once the social programs are being more effective.

 @B4BF3T3from Alberta  answered…3wks3W

Police and social and community programs should work collaboratively to ensure best social and public outcomes possible. Police should not be refunded but the result of collaboration should be more focused on better and healthier community and personal outcomes for the individuals involved

 @B49GFH5Liberalfrom Alberta  answered…3wks3W

Police should instead be reviewed for abuse of power consistently and trained in non-violent de-escalation. Police should go under the same biased testing as juries do before being able "serve justice"

 @B486XBXfrom Alberta  answered…3wks3W

Urban and rural need two different approaches. Urban policing should defund some programs to fund some social programs. Rurally we need more police.

 @B47JZP3from Alberta  answered…3wks3W

No, just increase funding for social based community programs while maintaining funding levels for local police.

 @B46TQHLfrom Alberta  answered…3wks3W

Funding should be determined on a community needs basis. Some communities need higher police presence due to crime rates, while others would benefit from an increase in social and community programs. More police funding should be put into adequate training for situations involving mental health and disenfranchised individuals to prevent excessive use of force or misattributing symptoms to drug use.

 @B46PXPWfrom Alberta  answered…3wks3W

Redirect more department funds towards training programs, diversity / poverty / mental health training, and increase social & community based programs.

 @B46CB8Lfrom Alberta  answered…3wks3W

Funding should be given to both, not redirected. Our police budgets have continually decreased and they are unable to do their jobs as well. BUT, social and community based programs should also have increased funding.

 @B45YJHPNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…4wks4W

Yes, we should have other levels of response for non-violent or mental health situations. But we could also attempt better screening & training to police officers for these situations

 @B45VSS9New Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…4wks4W

Some funding should be redirected to mental health agencies, to deal with offenders that are mentally ill.

 @B43SXTX from Alberta  answered…4wks4W

Shift non-criminal crisis response (e.g., mental health calls) to specialized teams while keeping police focused on serious crime.

Increase funding for both policing and community programs instead of taking from one to fund the other.

Invest in de-escalation and mental health training for officers to improve public interactions.

Audit police budgets to cut inefficiencies without reducing necessary law enforcement services.

 @B43QV9Mfrom Alberta  answered…4wks4W

No, the police should no longer be involved with non-criminal events, public safety officers with specialized public training to deescalate and mental issues on top of self defense courses - these should be doing the majority of civil work like traffic tickets, bylaw enforcement, patrolling the streets. The way it used to work was better.

 @B3YJC7GLiberalfrom Alberta  answered…1mo1MO

Yes redirect some of the police department spending to mental health teams that work directing with the police.

 @B3RYFGFNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…1mo1MO

Both social parties and police need to work together in partnership to best influence as both have separate skill sets with small amounts of overlap.

 @B37ZK3Kfrom Alberta  answered…2mos2MO

Community programs are good and something we should strive for but not at the cost of defunding local police

 @B36RD53from Alberta  answered…2mos2MO

it depends on what programs they are being funded for because the police should also recieve some funds for the protection they prodive aswell

 @B36R5TYfrom Alberta  answered…2mos2MO

I personally think that there should be a balance, funding towards law enforcement in society is crucial, therefore the funds necessary to maintain law enforcement should remain dedicated to this cause. Funding for community based programs should not be taken out of law enforcement funding.

 @B349N9Vfrom Alberta  answered…2mos2MO

No, and increase funding and training for police to recognize when an event requires a mental health professional and allow them access to work with those professionals.

 @B32P3GSLiberalfrom Alberta  answered…2mos2MO

Better training. More diversity to reflect community. Physical fitness tests every 5 years. More community policing instead of reactive

 @B2YZZ9TConservativefrom Alberta  answered…2mos2MO

Yes because many community programs could benefit lots of people and there are a lot of cops that seem to be more worried about the people on the road and vehicles rather than the bigger criminals who rob, assult, kill, etc. From my experience there are more cops trying to catch people speeding or finding broken tailights than trying to catch criminals that are way worse then the people who speed so I feel that if they aren't going to worry about the bigger criminals then they shouldn't get all of the funding money.

 @B2WMF2Rfrom Alberta  answered…2mos2MO

Downsize police forces and increase funding for them to respond to threats of physical natures. Replace all other calls with a community/mental health approach to de-escalation and referall to resources.

 @B2SSCR3from Alberta  answered…2mos2MO

rather than take from the police abolish department waste and put more money into communities separately

 @B2QVY2Pfrom Alberta  answered…3mos3MO

Slightly more for local police departments and the rest be redirected to social and community based programs

 @B2Q2MBVfrom Alberta  answered…3mos3MO

it would benefit the community but it would lead to more crime on the streets if not enough funds are going to the police

 @B2P2T62from Alberta  answered…3mos3MO

Yes, but funding should also be allocated for further training of police officers so less death, discrimination, and escalation happens

 @B2NXY75New Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…3mos3MO

Potentially; if further funding is allocated to preventative measures, such as community based programs, only after proof of success (i.e. lower crime rate) should funding for responsive measures such as police be lessened.

 @B2N5PX8from Alberta  answered…3mos3MO

I think it should be the same, both police staff should be treated and trained the right way and funded to do so as well as more to be able to access other needs as well as the thoughts of the citizens and how they feel about the community they live in and what should be there.

 @B2MNNH5from Alberta  answered…3mos3MO

The police shouldn't be defunded, but social and community-based programs should have more funding, which in turn would lower crime rates.

 @B2HHSTVfrom Alberta  answered…3mos3MO

We need to fund both police and social programs. Hopefully, more action on social issues will eventually reduce the need for police.

 @B2HCVRYfrom Alberta  answered…3mos3MO

Less funding for "Money Grab" policing, speed cameras, red light cameras, placing speed enforcement on known "faster" roadways, and more funding for investigative policing, and police training in todays world.

 @B29J5Z3Liberalfrom Alberta  answered…3mos3MO

Yes, but police should still be active but under a new protocol that ensures safety and communication as a priority first over anything that may cause harm.

 @B29DVC3from Alberta  answered…3mos3MO

No, but it should be redirected internally within the police force to better education and community based tools

 @B28GXWWfrom Alberta  answered…3mos3MO

Increase funding for both police and social services for mental health and increase staff and training for mental health calls in the community

 @B286ZK4New Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…4mos4MO

Funding should be split between better social training for POs and social/emergency services like EMTs and social workers for violent or mental health related incidents

 @9ZYRK5Zfrom Alberta  answered…4mos4MO

More community based programs, but we also need a over haul of the entire policing system. Weed out the bad ones and retraining

 @9ZKKRXNfrom Alberta  answered…5mos5MO

I think that some resources should be redirected within departments to assist with training officers to deal with social issues and non-violent offenders better.

 @9ZGGXJ6from Alberta  answered…5mos5MO

There should be targeted de-escalation training that should be reviewed and scored on performance, at the same time, balance out the the funding where it's most required. Local jurisdictions should be able to allocate funding based on needs if they are doing their jobs.

 @9YNQFHTNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…5mos5MO

Yes, and training should be provided to police and 911 operators to ensure that the proper programs are dispatched to ongoing incidents.

 @9WTF59Rfrom Alberta  answered…6mos6MO

Only have police with guns respond to violent crimes. Have unarmed peace officers respond to everything else

 @9V9BQ4Cfrom Alberta  answered…7mos7MO

The security of communities is to important to redirect the police funding to social programs. Money should be given to Social programs and allocated properly so that the right people get the right help

 @9V5Y68Nfrom Alberta  answered…7mos7MO

I'm in favour of the funding for non-policing forms of public safety, although I still feel as though there should be some form of police force, though I know it's harder to fund both

 @9V3Z483from Alberta  answered…7mos7MO

the answers are flawed their should be an in-between my answer would be " they should take away a percentage lets say between 15% to 25% of the funding for police and redirect that to social programs but that is not saying that police work isn't important but it is in need of regulation

 @9TWJNTXNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…7mos7MO

We need both police and increases to social work programs. Proactive care first, but reactive care if needed

 @9TTCGQSfrom Alberta  answered…7mos7MO

No, funding should be directed to social and community based programs but “abolishing the police” and reducing funding for police is not an answer

 @9TJ6VW7Liberalfrom Alberta  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, community programs should be funded more but it shouldn't take away from our first responder's who also need more funding

 @9TFR624from Alberta  answered…7mos7MO

the police department shouldn't be defunded, but there should be a lot more community based programs being funded.

 @9TD4C8Dfrom Alberta  answered…7mos7MO

No, funding for police should stay the same but still give social and community programs more funding

 @9T8FDXGfrom Alberta  answered…7mos7MO

No. Keep police infrastructure and replace the quota system to reduce police incentive for violence. Officers should also be required to go through a screening, particularly violent individuals should not be allowed on the force.

 @9T3YWJJfrom Alberta  answered…7mos7MO

There is a fine balance between police funding and community programs. There should be more training for police officers, and they do need to have firearms for viloent encounters. However, guns should NOT be the first choice for an officer unless provoked by another gun. There should also be more funding and support for community based programs, and there should be more accesibility to them.

 @9T3FFHNfrom Alberta  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, but keep police for more violent matters, in situations where a person isn't a threat a unarmed person should go along with a police officer and try and deescalate the situation before the police act.

 @9T29GLMfrom Alberta  answered…8mos8MO

i believe they should be trained to respond to certain situations differently. and i also believe they should be monitored more

 @9STLGWFConservativefrom Alberta  answered…8mos8MO

Both are important ways to enforce the law. Social and community based programs are simply better long term solutions. However, the police should not be underfunded for this purpose.

 @9SLYYBCGreenfrom Alberta  answered…8mos8MO

Yes more social programs but more training, making our police more versatile than force in any situation. More training, less force.

 @9RNN5KTNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…9mos9MO

Keep police funding the same as it is now and eliminate budget raises. Use the money that would go to raising police budgets to fund community safety and crime prevention programs.

 @9Q6NXYQfrom Alberta  answered…10mos10MO

No but they should go through more training and be provided or required to take courses regarding race and other cultures to open their eyes and minds and to hopefully prevent more incidents requiring race to happen

 @9NKWLDMfrom Alberta  answered…11mos11MO

No, but leave the budget for the police intact and draw funding from different parts of the city's budget

 @9MKYHZ7from Alberta  answered…11mos11MO

No, but police hiring and screening standards should be raised so that officers are effective but mindful of peoples needs and only use force as a very last resort

 @9MC4BQLfrom Alberta  answered…11mos11MO

Change training or more strick psychological evaluations. The lack of help for the native population, specifically native woman that go missing and not enough is done.

 @9M6X2Z8from Alberta  answered…12mos12MO

Increase police funding to provide training and staffing able to deal with social and mental health issues more appropriately

 @9M5MYJCfrom Alberta  answered…12mos12MO

You need to spend money on police and social programs together, until the effects of supporting people have been able to reduce crime. Police should not be dealing with people who need need support, not force. Police also should not be as militarized as they are becoming.

 @9LY36KSfrom Alberta  answered…12mos12MO

We should put more money into training police in higher crime city's and for lower put that money towards community based programs

 @9L7P6GJfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

yes depending on the city, for example the lethbridge police is a wonderful service to lethbridge that go above and beyond to help the community

 @9L7D6G4from Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

No, rather funding should increase to provide extensive training to ensure our current and future Police workers can handle their great responsibility in a safe manner for everyone, especially for their own safety.

 @9KYB6X7from Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

This should be a blended approach. Increase social programs but not at the cost of police, until the benefits have taken effect

 @9KMFJ99from Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

use current funds to train police officers to better handle situations involving mental health issues and other nonviolent options to prevent crimes.

 @9KFC52Vfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

no, but it is better to rehabilitate criminals and make them functioning members of society instead of throwing them in jail

 @9K4LLL8Conservativefrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

not all but some of the funding should go to social and community programs to understand safety and rights protection.

 @9K3323PNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

I believe that police should be funded into training- allowing police to learn asl and educated more on citizens needs are a must into becoming a policeman.

 @9JTV6YYfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

No, increase funding for the training of police departments and community programs to create a more positive relationship between the police and the public.

 @9JS8GNHfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

The police get paid for risking their lives in what they do. it doesn't make sense to take money away that they're getting for some other reasons.

 @9JQ8T5Jfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but still fund local police departments & require all law enforcement officers follow a strict code of conduct.

 @9JM8LNCfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

There should be a balance of funding law enforcement AND redirect to social/community based programs.

 @9JLDB4Xfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

Police units should be paired with social workers, mental health workers, etc. so they can go out on teams for suicide, domestic abuse, etc.

 @9J5ZH7HLiberalfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

I think there is a middle ground. Where funds toward police can be minimized but not removed entirely.

 @9J4C96T from Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

Police should have lowered funding and if those funds were to go to better social and community programs that would be the most ideal solution.

 @9HNLZPBfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but split the police into different departments that handle different types of violations (e.x: Highway patrol)

 @9H9CM57New Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

I think that we should lower the funding for police slightly and put more money towards rehabilitaion, counseling, etc so we have fewer criminals.

 @9H9BDYLfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

I think they should stop giving money to them and focus on the city/town if they make the place look good and do upgrades everywhere there would probably would be more tourist attractions and the crime rate would probably go down and our towns situation could be fixed with stealing and drugs.

 @9H6GJSNfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

Just make a budget that makes it possible to ensure that both areas get the funding required, this ensures that both are able to benefit as both are important to the community.

 @9GH2KFFfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

No. The government's job is to create laws and enforce them. The police are necessary and should receive much more funding.

 @9G8F9LCNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

no, current funding should be used for teaching about mental health issues in the people as well as de-escalating situations and non-violent tactics

 @9G4FL6Z from Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

No, ONLY if they increase the training for police departments everywhere and ADDING an unarmed community branch for non-violent calls

 @9FSSWS7New Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

No, but efforts should be made to hire more social workers, mental health specialists and addiction counsellors to complement police officers.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...