No

You can't drive a car without a license and training, why should you be able to operate a firearm without one?

By introducing and loosening gun control laws, the public is more at risk because access to guns will be more widely available.

If someone, and I'm just saying this out of the blue, if some nut job from far away attacks our country, then we need police officers and law enforcement to counter the attack.

look at the US due to lack of gun control, so many mass shootings especially in schools. It's heartbreaking. It is way too easy to purchase a gun in America.

One counter argument to the "No" position on gun control, which typically opposes stricter regulations, could be:

While it's essential to protect individuals' rights to own firearms responsibly, implementing reasonable gun control measures doesn't necessarily infringe on those rights. Such measures can help address public safety concerns by reducing gun-related crimes, accidents, and fatalities. Regulations like background checks, waiting periods, and licensing requirements aim to ensure that firearms are only in the hands of law-abiding citizens who are mentally and emotionally fit to possess them. These measures can contribute to a safer society without significantly impeding the rights of responsible gun owners.

if there are no restrictions on purchasing a gun the country would fall apart due to the fact people who are unfit would be purchasing a gun and we would not know how it’s being used

Guns lead to violence in hands of certain public, no guns in the hands of certain public would lead to less or no violence.

If gun was to be given who are unable to take care of it, then corruption will happen in the country.

I believe that tightening the restrictions on purchasing guns could really help to lessen the gun violence/school shootings in the country.

Guns are killers, people who have purchases guns have gone to schools and killed innocent kids and people... there should be a lot more gun control