Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Show more types:

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of Gun Control

288 Replies

 @9MGKJW2Liberalfrom Ontario  answered…11mos11MO

Expand self defence law and allow the carrying of weapons for personal safety but ban concealed carry and introduce strict background check and psych test law.

 @9CLG96WLiberalfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

The restrictions are perfectly fine. Something like 95+% of gun crime is committed with illegally imported firearms and the majority of the other 5% is committed with stolen firearms. Gun owners are background checked every day (veterans are checked twice a day), and lose their license if they commit a crime. Many of the recent bans on firearms were banning military-exclusive weapons from public use, which caused lots of panic when people thought regular citizens could own anti-aircraft weaponry for example.

 @95H8D8XLiberalfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8ZBWQJKLiberalfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8XDPSB4Liberalfrom New Brunswick  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8WZ3JP6Liberalfrom Manitoba  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8QS9XYDLiberalfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8PLGPDPLiberalfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

No, the gun restrictions should be loosened greatly except for those with a criminal background or mental illnesses.

 @8HSVF9PLiberalfrom Ontario  answered…5yrs5Y

criminals do illegal things it dose not matter what restrictions you place a thief is going to steel and a murder will kill. i think people need to look at this in a different way

 @8F9LY4PLiberalfrom Ontario  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8DYMHVGLiberalfrom Ontario  answered…5yrs5Y

I have my PAL/RPAL gun license, I got it to help me peruse a career in law enforcement as I believed it would help me. I love Canada's gun laws compared to America but they could be more strict, guns should not be in the hands of civilians but only in the hands of someone with government authority like a armed guard who moves money with an armored car and Police.

 @99PWRSHLiberalfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

The process of attaining a firearm is already strong enough. there should be less restrictions on what firearms can be purchased to licensed carriers.

 @8G8TYJKLiberalfrom Ontario  answered…5yrs5Y

I think that if someone wants to get a gun, they're going to get a gun no matter what country it is so I believe any more strict laws will make it difficult for people that actually need guns to get them.

 @8S2Y83ZLiberalfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, they should continue with background checks anyone with a criminal background that involved any type of weapon should have to go through psychological testing and training

 @8QMB29J from California  answered…4yrs4Y

No restrictions because it's our 2nd amendment, it's our right to defend ourselves, and in case of a national emergency like another great depression or a war in our homeland, we need to use a firearm either to defend our selves or hunt animals to put food in the table

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, by uniformly requiring strict background checks and closing the gun show loophole

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, require universal background checks, close the gun show loophole, and ban all further sales of assault weapons

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, require universal background checks, close the gun show loophole, and ban all further sales of assault weapons.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, by upholding and strengthening the National Instant Background Check system (NICS) and closing the gun show loophole

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, by closing the gun show loophole and requiring strict background checks

 @8TQHNB4 from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

close gun show loophole, require background checks, psychological test, and training and ban assault weapons

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, by requiring strict background checks and closing the gun show loophole

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, conduct thorough background checks, close the gun show loophole, and end the sale of assault weapons

 @8QNDV53 from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training

Yes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training. Further, there should be a limit on the type of guns sold and purchased, periodic checks, and Ban carrying of guns

 @8PGP4Q7 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes just a brief mental health evaluation and there should be more in depth for assault weapons

 @8DDP7D3 from California  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, and ban all automatic of semi-automatic rifles. All gun purchases should be on a national data base, and there needs to be a waiting period and background checks.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...