+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 732 Rhinoceros voters.

49%
Yes
51%
No
49%
Yes
51%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 732 Rhinoceros voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 732 Rhinoceros voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Rhinoceros voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9SSRG9Hfrom Manitoba  answered…6mos6MO

Artists should be held to the same standards as anyone who is sort employed. The selling of their art is a business.

 @9ZRQ8ZPfrom Nova Scotia  answered…4mos4MO

 @9ZTRL63from British Columbia  answered…3mos3MO

Yes, but only for artists who are making a certain a substantial income off their work

 @B2SZMQDfrom Ontario  answered…1mo1MO

Yes, artists should be held to the same standards as everything else, while also making sure the process is very simple and non-tedious.

 @B2P2T62from Alberta  answered…1mo1MO

It should always be considered income and treated as such. Like retail institutions selling a product, an artist is selling their product. However, rules should still apply for authenticity of large works

 @B2J3VBFfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

I think that extent of reporting is somewhat extreme, but art should be reported as it can easily be manipulated to provide unfair benefits to certain people or be involved in "funny business".

 @B26C299from Ontario  answered…3mos3MO

 @B268QZVfrom British Columbia  answered…3mos3MO

Depends. Most aren’t making enough to get by, and we need the arts to have a vibrant community.