+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 1.4k Right voters.

55%
Yes
45%
No
54%
Yes
45%
No
1%
Yes, but only if the sales price is high enough to justify it as an investment

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.4k Right voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 1.4k Right voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Right voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9SSRG9Hfrom Manitoba  answered…8mos8MO

Artists should be held to the same standards as anyone who is sort employed. The selling of their art is a business.

 @9ZRQ8ZPfrom Nova Scotia  answered…5mos5MO

 @9ZTRL63from British Columbia  answered…5mos5MO

Yes, but only for artists who are making a certain a substantial income off their work

 @B4H5T5Zfrom Alberta  answered…2wks2W

There should be categories for smaller groups and larger groups depending on how much the income is.

 @B4BM96Jfrom Quebec  answered…3wks3W

depending on the value of the artwork in question. High value transactions should be treated as such, but most artists don't get high value commissions

 @B2SZMQDfrom Ontario  answered…3mos3MO

Yes, artists should be held to the same standards as everything else, while also making sure the process is very simple and non-tedious.

 @B2P2T62from Alberta  answered…3mos3MO

It should always be considered income and treated as such. Like retail institutions selling a product, an artist is selling their product. However, rules should still apply for authenticity of large works

 @B2J3VBFfrom Ontario  answered…3mos3MO

I think that extent of reporting is somewhat extreme, but art should be reported as it can easily be manipulated to provide unfair benefits to certain people or be involved in "funny business".