Cross-border payment methods, such as cryptocurrencies, allow individuals to transfer money internationally, often bypassing traditional banking systems. The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctions countries for various political and security reasons, restricting financial transactions with these nations. Proponents argue that such a ban prevents financial support to regimes considered hostile or dangerous, ensuring compliance with international sanctions and national security policies. Opponents argue that it restricts humanitarian aid to families in need, infringes on personal freedoms, and that cryptocurrencies can provide a lifeline in crisis situations.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Political party
Ideology
Province/Territory
Response rates from 1k Left voters.
31% Yes |
69% No |
31% Yes |
69% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1k Left voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 1k Left voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Left voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9YD23V42wks2W
To ban/limit a citizens right to utilize their money/property is wrong but it should be monitored/regulated and/or taxed.
@9X56Y5B3wks3W
cause this people they just want to send money to their love ones,but i think think countries should make a legal payment methods to the people that just want to send money to their love ones.
@9WK3LGV4wks4W
Yes, but make it simple to send it through your regular banking
@9TYHMNT2mos2MO
Yes. Only if they are expected to use that money for illegal activities.
@9TY279W2mos2MO
Don't ban, but put regulations or surveillance on these type of transactions.
@9TSS8RJ2mos2MO
Only if the family is needing the funds to flee the country
@9TS28Y82mos2MO
Not ban but certainly safe guards should be in place to ensure the funds are not for war/terrorist activities.
@9TG8PL62mos2MO
If they were closely monitored for criminal use, yes
Join in on the most popular conversations.