+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 242 H3H voters.

86%
Yes
14%
No
86%
Yes
14%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 242 H3H voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 242 H3H voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from H3H voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9VVGC59from British Columbia  answered…5mos5MO

No, we should not open the pandora's box to modifying DNA which can have harmful social implications in the future

 @B2SXCQRfrom Alberta  answered…1mo1MO

It's too diverse of a question to be filtered into a yes or no. Science has the change to have a negative impact

 @B2PT6BZfrom Ontario  answered…1mo1MO

Yes, the research should be done within reason (the research could lead to more knowledge about diseases, but also lead to a dark side of eugenics)

 @9TMMVLNfrom Alberta  answered…6mos6MO

I would say yes to some extent as long as it's for a preventional reason like for instance preventing a deadly disease that affects the whole society not on just a handful on people..

 @9T9YZJHfrom British Columbia  answered…6mos6MO

No, but in the future, if diseases like monkey pox was to reach a covid 19 level of concern, then I would want that a top priority.

 @9RZPX67from Alberta  answered…7mos7MO

no, that is nothing but neo eugenics, a neo nazi school of thought, which our government and forefathers disagree with/ died protecting against

 @9QNDV5Pfrom Ontario  answered…8mos8MO

They have to be VERY VERY VERY careful when they do it but it can save lives and somebody is going to do it eventually so yes

 @B299V9Wfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

The government research regarding health care is too corrupt and tied with psychopathic CDC and big Pharma.