+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 230 Milton voters.

92%
Yes
8%
No
92%
Yes
8%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 230 Milton voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 230 Milton voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Milton voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9YJQM5Lfrom Ontario  answered…2wks2W

as long as they can be held accountable with fail safes put into place as it is a slippery slope into eugenics territory

 @9YJ9C4Yfrom Ontario  answered…2wks2W

It’s a thin line. Lots of rules would have to be set in place for using this kind of thing for me to feel comfortable about the idea.

 @9WW3GTHfrom Alberta  answered…4wks4W

It depends on what is being considered a disease. Considering homosexuality was classified as a disease not too long ago, it seems like too much of a blanket term to be in usage for genetic prevention.

 @9WC2362from British Columbia  answered…1mo1MO

Yes, as long as the advancements are thoroughly tested and verified to be free of long term negative side effects

 @9WBDHC5from British Columbia  answered…1mo1MO

well any government cannot be trusted at any level about medical research since we all know who finances all this...

 @9W8GJCBfrom Ontario  answered…1mo1MO

To the highest degree, this is an extremely important issue with keeping people alive and preventing possible biological warfare.

 @9W46KMMfrom British Columbia  answered…1mo1MO

Yes, make it as long as one’s life can ever last. A democracy to quality humans leads to a greater future of humanity in Canada’s society.

 @9VVGC59from British Columbia  answered…1mo1MO

No, we should not open the pandora's box to modifying DNA which can have harmful social implications in the future