Answer Overview

Response rates from 14.5k Canada voters.

46%
Yes
54%
No
46%
Yes
54%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 14.5k Canada voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 14.5k Canada voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Canada voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9VXFS77from Quebec answered…4 days4D

No, companies should be required to provide information but not build a backdoor that could be exploited

 @9VVQ5VCfrom British Columbia answered…6 days6D

Possibly, if there are proper criteria to adhere to regarding privacy issues and enough evidence to prov necessary, including warrants.

 @9VS38F8from Ontario answered…1wk1W

I don't think it is the most important thing but it would be good if they could have some way of accessing it to identify people they need to get

 @9VNLZBYfrom British Columbia answered…1wk1W

the government can be told but they don't have the right to tell it to anyone and they can't force you to change things.

 @9VM3C67from Ontario answered…2wks2W

I believe certain tech companies should depending on the severity of the use for the site's/websites

 @9VKMP3Gfrom Ontario answered…2wks2W

having a backdoor at all leaves room for anybody to get in with enough effort, while I think this would be beneficial, the risks outweigh the benefits.

 @9VGR4J9from British Columbia answered…2wks2W

I think a company in the case of hefty suspicion of national danger should fully assist the government in investigation but just a backdoor given entirely sounds easily and readily abusable for corrupt purposes I like my privacy

 @9VF4NS9from Ontario answered…2wks2W

Yes, only if there is doubt or even evidence that the message sender or receiver is a whistleblower or is doing something that is harming the national interest.