+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 231 V5Z voters.

35%
Yes
65%
No
35%
Yes
65%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 231 V5Z voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 231 V5Z voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from V5Z voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZMNZYVfrom New Brunswick  answered…5 days5D

Yes, when it comes to warrants specific to this information and with proper security protocols on access to the into and adhering to human rights

 @9ZGGXJ6from Alberta  answered…2wks2W

No but encrypted communication providers should have to provide the information of an individual if there is a proper warrant for the suspected individual tied to an event to be presented in court hearings.

 @9ZF2H6Yfrom Ontario  answered…2wks2W

There should be specific and limited conditions that need to be met, and some form of accountability is necessary.

 @9ZD7HCGfrom New York  answered…2wks2W

But access must be consistent with criminal law protections and strict anti-abuse regulations should be simultaneously passed

 @9ZBHJJNfrom British Columbia  answered…2wks2W

HELL NO. Digital services are vulnerable to all intruders all across the world. Have some mystical backdoor access is just BEGGING for someone from some obscure part of the world to come knocking the door down

 @9YMQZBKfrom Saskatchewan  answered…2wks2W

No, I don't think so, because the more accesses there are available, the easier it is for someone not intended to see the communication to hack in.

 @9YBFNJZfrom Ontario  answered…3wks3W

yes but they have to be specific on whos files the need and what there using it for otherwise it should not be used.

 @9Y2D4VJfrom British Columbia  answered…3wks3W

No because if someone were to go rogue such as a government agent they could shut the world down if they knew even a few of the big company’s back doors