AI in defense refers to the use of artificial intelligence technologies to enhance military capabilities, such as autonomous drones, cyber defense, and strategic decision-making. Proponents argue that AI can significantly enhance military effectiveness, provide strategic advantages, and improve national security. Opponents argue that AI poses ethical risks, potential loss of human control, and can lead to unintended consequences in critical situations.
Response rates from 14.6k Canada voters.
53% Yes |
47% No |
53% Yes |
47% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 14.6k Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 14.6k Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Canada voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9VWVZQB5 days5D
Yes, but should not be replacing any jobs. It should be a research tool opposed to a replacement to human input. It's not powerful enough yet in my eyes
@9VSPPZL1wk1W
i believe that if the government were to invest in (ai) they should add restrictions and be extremely cautious and at some point take hypothetical scenarios into account. but overall (ai) should be used for everything in term of research and methods on how to possibly do things such as agriculture and environmental safety.
@9VMWZRK1wk1W
Artificial Intelligence Should be abolished as it is dangerous and can be easily manipulated, human intelligence is superior. .
@9VMJ4571wk1W
Only if not doing so poses a threat to national security -- and not for any other purpose besides national security
@9VCJBMD2wks2W
Yes, but only so we don't get far behind in military technology. And as long as it can be overridden easily.
@9V9JVX33wks3W
I believe it should be utilized, and maintained by the proper people of power, and be used for good against humanity. For example: in wars to be used against certain gases, and more.
@9V9BQ4C3wks3W
There are good and bad qualities to artificial intelligence so it all depends on the applications of the AI and where the spending goes towards it.
@9TZKMBH3wks3W
Other countries may use it, but it is certainly a scary idea, and I wouldn't want to be without it if they attack us with it, so yes and no.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
