Full accessibility ensures that public transportation accommodates people with disabilities by providing necessary facilities and services. Proponents argue that it ensures equal access, promotes independence for people with disabilities, and complies with disability rights. Opponents argue that it can be costly to implement and maintain and may require significant modifications to existing systems.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Political party
Ideology
Province/Territory
Response rates from 387 Left voters.
95% Yes |
5% No |
95% Yes |
5% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 387 Left voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 387 Left voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Left voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZMZ74W3 days3D
Yes but it can't happen all at once gradually get more accessable
@9WQY7BP4wks4W
Yes, and increase penalties for disability discrimination
@9WHRDPN4wks4W
yes but define fully accessible, the gov can't give personalized transport to everyone
@9WGGM9M1mo1MO
yes but it is under the decision of the local government not the state or federal
@9TS28Y82mos2MO
Government should find a balance that is the most economical for assisting people with disabilities get to where they need to go, whether that is through upgrading of a public system, adding accessibility to existing infrastructure, or building unique infrastructure.
@9RZPX673mos3MO
to a certain point, taxpayer funded anything should be accessible to those who actually pay taxes
@9RCJ67T4mos4MO
Not require, but provide incentives for municipalities that do
@9P8NRFM 5mos5MO
Yes, and transportation systems that are not as easily accessible to disabled individuals should be renovated or if need be, replaced so that they able to provide appropriate accessibility for both people with disabilities and without disabilities.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
