Statistics are shown for this demographic
Province/Territory
Electoral District (2011)
Response rates from 636k Canada voters.
32% Yes |
68% No |
20% Yes |
63% No |
10% Yes, if the landowners are fairly compensated |
2% No, do not build the pipeline but allow oil production in the tar sands |
3% Yes, the pipeline is necessary for the economic future of Canada |
2% No, do not build the pipeline and shut down all oil production in the tar sands |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 636k Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 636k Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Canada voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@8VJ7MXZ3yrs3Y
Yes, but only if they consent and are compensated for it
@Canadianpunk89 2wks2W
Not, not unless the landowners are fairly compensated and all Indigenous communities in the area agree.
@9FT46P41yr1Y
A stronger discussion should be had between the government and the first nation peoples to make a compromise between the two parties. The land should be protected while also allowing the pipeline to be built elsewhere to provide employment for the first nations peoples surrounding the area of the pipeline.
@9FQ2ZJY1yr1Y
No, this may pressure private land owners into taking money at their long term jealth and safety
@9FL5ZGX1yr1Y
Only if the land owners agree to it with a fairly compensated agreement.
@9FHNJS31yr1Y
TransCanada should compensate for using their land and lost resources
@9F98QST1yr1Y
Only if the landowners give permission and are fairly compensated
@9F3YN582yrs2Y
No the pipeline is a poor idea, why are we sending raw materials out of the country when we could refine and use them locally to reduce costs to the people that live here. Don’t get me started on how invasive it will be to the remaining wilderness. Stop obsessing over oil and gas, its non renewable and it will run out, its high time to move on from fossil fuels.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
