Statistics are shown for this demographic
Province/Territory
Electoral District (2013)
Electoral District (2011)
Response rates from 10.5k Halton voters.
33% Yes |
67% No |
17% Yes |
64% No |
15% Yes, but only selective logging, no clearcutting, and a plan for regrowth |
3% No, preservation of our forests outweighs the economic benefits |
1% Yes, but only if the profits stay in Canada |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 10.5k Halton voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 10.5k Halton voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Halton voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B43PS781mo1MO
Selective logging, no clearcutting and plan for regrowth and also helping to ensure profits stay in canada.
@B3GFTZ32mos2MO
How insane that this is even considered. What moron thinks the money from trees is more valuable than the oxygen from trees. Leave our trees alone.
@9WYDMSD6mos6MO
Yes, only if the profits stay in canada by being used by canadian companies or state run industry, with plans for regrowth and no clearcutting, trees are necessary, both for our economy but also for our climate.
@9F3BQD82yrs2Y
Maybe, depends on the forest
@9DTTBXP2yrs2Y
The definition of old growth to be older trees, and there should be selective logging and no clear cutting
@8VBFZBC4yrs4Y
Maybe. Only with the approval of First Nations if the land is theirs (ie crown land) and NO clear cutting.
@B29KW773mos3MO
Yes only if the indigenous peoples that have be caretakers of the land for millennia agree they should be longed to help with traditional burns to prevent bigger fires from occurring. It had less to do with logging potential and more with indigenous prevention of forest fires.
@9MC4BQL12mos12MO
We can have plots of land for logging with a good plan for regrowth. Respect the things that came before and should be able to live on after.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Logging” news articles, updated frequently.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
