+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 119k Right voters.

52%
Yes
48%
No
36%
Yes
47%
No
14%
Yes, but only selective logging, no clearcutting, and a plan for regrowth
1%
No, preservation of our forests outweighs the economic benefits
1%
Yes, but only if the profits stay in Canada

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 119k Right voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 119k Right voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Right voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9WYDMSDfrom British Columbia  answered…4wks4W

Yes, only if the profits stay in canada by being used by canadian companies or state run industry, with plans for regrowth and no clearcutting, trees are necessary, both for our economy but also for our climate.

 @9DTTBXPfrom British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

The definition of old growth to be older trees, and there should be selective logging and no clear cutting

 @9LJGNWT from British Columbia  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, through selective logging and forest regeneration AND secondary and tertiary manufacturing within Canada. Sending ANY logs overseas or out of country for processing elsewhere is bad... but so are the closed shop union businesses that cannot be profitable compared to non-unionized production elsewhere.

 @9GPTJ2Dfrom British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

No, there are many alternative wood-engineered products that are now available that do not rely on the size/quality of old-growth lumber. Old growth lumber is used primary for cosmetic / vanity and should be banned from use. Furthermore, most old-growth logs are exported so they may be sold for the highest proffet, benefiting the seller, not the community in which the old growth forest was removed.

 @9D4R2DYfrom Quebec  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only selective logging, no clearcutting, and a plan for regrowth. The profits should also only be within Canada.