In 2010 the Conservative government introduced a crime bill which would kill the so-called faint hope clause that allows some people serving life sentences to apply for parole after 15 years (instead of the usual 25 common for first-degree murder and other life sentence convictions). Opponents of the crime bill argue that extended prison sentences are cruel and will cost the government tens of millions of dollars per year.Proponents argue that 15 years is too short of a prison term for people serving life sentences.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
@8Z4ZDM83yrs3Y
It matters on if the person is willing or is he just going to exploit this
@8YCSK9C3yrs3Y
First degree murder is a choice you chose to do that everyone IS equal but it’s common sense not to kill someone no mercy for them
@8VVJN274yrs4Y
As long as their not rapists
@8VPRJ634yrs4Y
Depends on how many they killed
@8VMTH7M4yrs4Y
Depends on what’s going on with the person and what he’s suffering with
@8VMMNG34yrs4Y
@8V7LS654yrs4Y
This requires much more discussion
@8D3GNCV5yrs5Y
Depending on how they killed the person
@9CTVZG72yrs2Y
I want rehab programs, but idk if first-degree murder perpetrators should be eligible for parole.
@9BCZWQP2yrs2Y
Depends on the severity of the crime and the situation.
@8YZY2463yrs3Y
it’s ok if you kill someone in self defence
@8YCNN9L3yrs3Y
Prisoners serving life sentences for first degree murder should be eligible for a parole hearing before 15 years depending on circumstance
@8VQ78KR4yrs4Y
Yes provided that they are not psychopath and are not 100% safe to society
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
