Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Electoral District (2011):

Electoral District (2013):

Reply

 @B2VF4BFfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, and we should provide more rehabilitation programs prisoners and a psychological evaluation that shows they are no longer a threat to society

 @9VPWFXCfrom Ontario  answered…6mos6MO

Yes in certain cases for example, if someone is assaulted or someone who they loved passes and they take revenge on the person I think they deserve parole

 @95YNSKTfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8XGL5GBfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VTRJNHConservativefrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes but if they can not be rehabilitated they have to wait another 15 years

 @8VR7XWLfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

If the murder was for protection yes. If murder for no reason no. Stay in your cell

 @8SLXKS8from Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

I feel like it should really be based on the conditions of the murder as I feel those really matter in the sense of whether someone would be likely to do something like that again.

 @8RWWTQSfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

No they should not be able to leave or get probation but they do their time

 @8RQTCTZLiberalfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

I think it should be a rehabilitation model. Finland has the best prison system. It’s unorthodox, but they have the lowest re-incarceration rate. In the end rehabilitation cost most initially, but saves more tax payer dollars with less re-incarceration. Pay it forward to do it right the first time.

 @8QLJMM2from Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

It depends on the situation if it was done to protect someone else or themselves, they should get psychological treatment. If it was done just because, they should be sent straight to prison.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...