In 2010 the Conservative government introduced a crime bill which would kill the so-called faint hope clause that allows some people serving life sentences to apply for parole after 15 years (instead of the usual 25 common for first-degree murder and other life sentence convictions). Opponents of the crime bill argue that extended prison sentences are cruel and will cost the government tens of millions of dollars per year.Proponents argue that 15 years is too short of a prison term for people serving life sentences.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
@9T4SKWM7mos7MO
the onlys ones who should receive this are people who killed in self defence or people who killed pedos and rapists
@9GWDDTK1yr1Y
Yes and there should be a psychological evaluation as well and rehabilitation programs and check in’s once released
@8ZV8KG53yrs3Y
It depends on the situation and why they killed.
depends on why they did it and their mental state
@8XM5JKTNew Democratic3yrs3Y
Yes, and we should provide more rehabilitation programs as well as provide psychological evaluation that shows they are no longer a threat.
@8VTNBS24yrs4Y
no and death penalty for certain situations
@8RSL3BM4yrs4Y
depends on the story about what happened or if it was self defense
@8R9JM754yrs4Y
This should be done case by case.
@8QW5GLH4yrs4Y
Yes, but only depending on the severity of the crime.
@8QVQ7864yrs4Y
It all depends on the scenario
@8PDJ92Z4yrs4Y
no, reinstate the death penalty, if proven they didnt commit the murder, reimburse the familly for their loss
@996N5CJ2yrs2Y
yes if they shows signs of being changed and also give them rehabilitation
@96T7SJ52yrs2Y
some cases i do some cases i dont
in some cases yes but in other no
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
