In 2010 the Conservative government introduced a crime bill which would kill the so-called faint hope clause that allows some people serving life sentences to apply for parole after 15 years (instead of the usual 25 common for first-degree murder and other life sentence convictions). Opponents of the crime bill argue that extended prison sentences are cruel and will cost the government tens of millions of dollars per year.Proponents argue that 15 years is too short of a prison term for people serving life sentences.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
@9JJC4PH1yr1Y
we should abolish the prison industrial complex and process harm through transformative and restorative justice
@9HQ9DW51yr1Y
Crimes of force and non consent should lead to death penalty or life with no parole. Cant be trusted again why would you. Murder/aggressive charges, do evaluations etc check if they r stable member of a community
@9BW2NCY2yrs2Y
It depends on why they did what they did, if it was out of self-defence or because they were being abused by the people who they killed of course. Even if it was because of other reasons they should offer good rehabilitation programs and go psych evaluations on them to make sure they're okay mentally..
@96GLR2B3yrs3Y
Yes, and we should work towards abolishing the prison system entirely.
Maybe,but give them a chance with a actual rehabilitation program.
We should keep people responsible but treat them better then prisons do
@95BS7H63yrs3Y
Yes, provided psychological evaluation and continued engagement in rehabilitative services to assess risk and mitigated risks for reoffending post release.
@8ZCNVDN3yrs3Y
It depends what the murder entails
No, unless they are 24 and under, your brain is fully developed when you are 25.
This is a complicated issue, but if someone killed me by accident or on purpose I would hope that this person could sent to a place where they can learn to cooperate with people and learn to control their rage, punishment only leads to rebellion, people need to be treated with respect when being rehabilitated not imprisoned
@8VRRWV24yrs4Y
Provide rehabilitation programs and psychological evaluation.
@8V8FJD44yrs4Y
It would depend heavily on the circumstance of the murder. If it was self defense, parole should be available immediately
@8TX3YTBNew Democratic4yrs4Y
Yes, depending on the reason behind their murder.
Yes and abolish the prison system.
@8TKFPRH4yrs4Y
Yes, and we should be working towards the abolition of prisons and carceral infrastructures by heavily investing in rehabilitation programs, models of restorative justice and community accountability, social services, and psychiatric health care.
@8RSV6D34yrs4Y
no, but provide more rehabilitation program for prisoners
@8R3WYS84yrs4Y
Depends how they murdered the person
@8Q78H854yrs4Y
Yes, but there should be many psychological evaluation/rehabilitation hurdles to jump through in order to get that parole.
@8PVDV2GNew Democratic4yrs4Y
No, but we should put in more rehabilitation programs and programs/systems to prevent this
@8PPY29H4yrs4Y
Maybe. Locking someone up in prison won’t fix anything. It’d probably make things worse. If they completely changed prisons then maybe
@8PK936W4yrs4Y
Depending on the crime. If the individual has killed several people they should not. Everyone else should be case by case, and rehabilitation is very important.
@8J84QVQ4yrs4Y
If there is case of wrongful conviction
@8H6N2C25yrs5Y
Yes, but it should be 30 years, psychological evaluation
@8FNZ34N5yrs5Y
rehabilitation and education during sentence and no chance for parole, also clearing of psychological state and long, strict probation
I believe they should serve their full sentence and they shouldn’t have an option to get out of prison. Murders should stay in prison and they don’t deserve to be out in the normal world
@8D8N7PL5yrs5Y
@9C8YJM32yrs2Y
I think when it comes to the specific situation of the prisoner, like if they were abused for years or had to kill out of self-defence then yes and provide rehabilitation for them. There should be rehabilitation for all prisoners of lower crime though.
@987GNWP2yrs2Y
You can’t buy a life once you takes someone’s life you can’t get it back so it wouldn’t be fair for someone to be on parole knowing they took something no one can get back
@96TXPDJ2yrs2Y
No, depends on the crime but for some after 30 years yes
@969Y6MJ3yrs3Y
Case by case basis (ie if they were very young at the time) & greatly increase funding for rehabilitation
Dependiendo del tipo de delito.
@8RG8QDQ4yrs4Y
Maybe, it depends on the situation.
@8KSPPR94yrs4Y
Yes, with rehabilitation and psychological evaluation
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
