Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Electoral District (2011):

Electoral District (2013):

Reply

 @B43SXTX from Alberta  answered…4wks4W

Require strict criteria for parole eligibility, such as demonstrated rehabilitation, remorse, and a low risk of reoffending.

Increase parole eligibility to 20–25 years instead of 15, to balance justice and rehabilitation.

Allow parole hearings but with strong victim and family involvement, ensuring their voices are heard in the decision-making process.

Use life without parole for extreme cases, such as serial killings or crimes involving extreme cruelty.

 @B2XHWX2from Alberta  answered…2mos2MO

It depends on the crime and the situation. Regardless, I think rehabilitation should be prioritized.

 @B2X89N2from Alberta  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, because if they are there for 15 years or longer an didn't do anything wrong in jail, and know what they have done and give a good parole hearing.

 @9RZPX67from Alberta  answered…8mos8MO

yes, only for cases where the defendant can prove with indisputable evidence that they were wrongfully convicted or have been significantly rehabilitated

 @9N5M4WWfrom Alberta  answered…11mos11MO

Yes - should provide more rehab programs AND a strict psych eval shows that they are no longer a threat to society.

 @9FGBY9Sfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

 @8VWLZM6from Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TYWNDPNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8QJJKKNfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, prior to reentering society they should have a strict psychological evaluation to make sure they aren’t a threat as well as we should be providing more rehabilitation programs for prisoners so that they are able to renter society after completing their sentence.

 @986BZ75from Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...