This considers limiting the integration of advanced technologies in vehicles to ensure humans retain control and to prevent dependency on technological systems. Proponents argue that it preserves human control and prevents over-reliance on potentially fallible technology. Opponents argue that it hinders technological progress and the benefits that advanced technology can bring to safety and efficiency.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Province/Territory:
@B3G5TN4New Democratic2mos2MO
Restrictions on things like screen size are fine, but I see no reason to ban technology that allows those with disabilities to drive.
@B34R5DS2mos2MO
they shouldn't restrict it but somewhat priorities human control and let people use technology sometimes.
@9ZXWXP25mos5MO
Yes and no, I think PWDs can rely with this technology to fully live their lives outside of their disabilities but at the same time yes, to those who are normal mentally and physically. Also there's need to be more intial tests with regards to these vehicles. Although I understand that prevention is better than cure, we cannot fully rely to these advanced vehicles. we need both attention and technology.
@9XQKGCV6mos6MO
It depends on the specific technology. Ultimately people need to control the speed, braking and steering of the vehicle.
@9XCFZ4Z6mos6MO
The risk of vehicles malfunctioning following a bad update or hacking attempt is too high. Human control (or at least, human override) is of importance
They should reduce things like self-driving cars to prevent car accidents, but let people continue to build cars that are better for the environment.
@9VKMP3G6mos6MO
the end goal for advanced technology and artificial intelligence was to make it so that humans no longer have to do the manual labour and can focus on art and love and other things that give us happiness over scanning groceries. in terms of vehicles i see a future wherein most cars are self driven and manual cars become a commodity and require a special license to operate.
@9VK2G4J6mos6MO
Yes, at least until the technology becomes better.
@9TLDMJL7mos7MO
No but over use should be restricted as it brings to question human safety.
@9T9MWWF7mos7MO
No, but advanced technology should be heavily tested before usage.
@9RXS4P4 8mos8MO
not necessarily to fully restrict but make sure there is no over reliance on technology
@9QZCYDN9mos9MO
Yes but only if the technology isn't more capable than the human driver. Once technology because better drivers than humans then no
@9QW7TQZ9mos9MO
No, allow people to rely on technology as it can provide a minimum access to a standard of safety on roads.
@9QSF59F9mos9MO
shouldnt be over relient but technological advances are good
@9QQHX9L10mos10MO
I believe humans should uphold skills while implementing technology.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
