Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
Electoral District (2011):
@9K446FR1yr1Y
Unfortunately, I don't think we will reach a that point, at least not for awhile. There's too many disagreements between world leaders and many of them are "pro-war" and have gained supporters who are also pro-war. So unfortunately I think this will be an issue for many more decades, centuries even.
@9KBGZHY1yr1Y
The war and concept of war is belong less respected throughout generations and I do beleivethat he will slowly more away from war, but people are angry and war does want to continue.
@9HQDTFG1yr1Y
I think Watchmen got it right: wars between humans can be obsolete but we would need an alien enemy to turn our attention.
@9K23BZR1yr1Y
In my opinion, anti-war is impossible as there are too many people and diversity among beliefs to agree with each other
No, humans are inherently territorial and violent.
No. The human nature does not allow a realistic scenario where we exist without war.
@9HN985T1yr1Y
Yes, war is defined by mass armies of people fighting one another. Taking out he figurehead of said army is usually enough to at least slow a war down so it doesn't result in thousands of deaths.
No. As unfortunate as it is, sometimes, we must fight for what we believe in.
@9JV9ZZM1yr1Y
No. Send thr politicians in to fight. Not the citizens.
@9JYBN45Conservative1yr1Y
Yes, the concept of war as a violent game and encounter will no longer exist. But conflicts will ever exist
@9HCVTMR1yr1Y
I hope so, but I don’t see it being possible in my lifetime.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
