Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
Yes, and invest in more research and innovation as well.
@8VRCCP24yrs4Y
Renewable energy sources should be used more please.
No, abolish coal, oil, and gas subsidies instead.
@8VN6FXM4yrs4Y
Yes, but only until fossil fuels are no longer used in society
Yes provided that it is a viable, safe, and effective choice
Renewable energy sources will continue to assist in the years of humans living on Earth and will reduce pollution, therefore subsidizing would be good.
Yes, but focus on private businesses in order to develop the industry to a size in which it can compete with other fuel sources in a free market. The subsidies should be granted to those with a strong business plan that clearly shows an acceptable timeframe to reach freedom from subsidization. the subsidization should be structured by reallocating the tax revenue and not by increasing taxes. We will also need to increase the capacity of their energy grids once they are in the energy pool more prominently.
not just a blanket statement would need to be reviewed on case by case
they should not take over all of it, to promote more innovative production of energy, but be given the option to.
@98RCD6Y2yrs2Y
Incentives rather than subsidize
@8VT7JDC4yrs4Y
yes only if it won't take homes away from animals.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
