Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Reply

 @93D3NW6from Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but not until fossil fuels have been phased out with nuclear. Renewables alone are not a solution, and should not be treated as such.

 @929F59GNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

Production if stansards are high, reasonable alternatives. Consumption should be subsidizeled in ant case

 @8VLTRHBfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8V894HKNew Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes but only if government gets equivalent stake in the businesses it subsidized

 @8V7D7L3from Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

No, they should investigate and support whatever carbon neutral energy production is sensible (i.e. nuclear and/or renewables)

 @8V5NFQCNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8V59VL5from Quebec  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8V4V4PFfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Renewable energy's like solar and wind are often more polluting over their whole life cycle, from production to disposal, than oil energy sources

 @8V28JMZNew Democraticfrom Nova Scotia  answered…4yrs4Y

I think that have lower costs for renewable energy sources and taxing things that heavily use fossil fuels would increase the amount of individuals, companies, and buildings who would use renewable energy.

 @8V23KN6New Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TYYJTRNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes but with much a more refined definition of what it will subsidize and what it will not.

 @8TYXSVHNew Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8P9P9VYNew Democraticfrom Manitoba  answered…4yrs4Y

if the amount of renewable energy increases than thousands of canadians could lose their jobs

 @8NS8DTXNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8LBMBSGfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, if the government can set up a good system for immediate and local usage of said sources and do so without upsetting local groundwater

 @8KG9P6Dfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

I am uneducated on this issue and need to learn more about it before I can give a clear, thoughtful answer.

 @8DDJKTQfrom Alberta  answered…5yrs5Y

we should have no companies and just put hose power sources in control of workers

 @99KVJHQNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

I'd rather have more options available for energy, including the government.

 @99HH6R5New Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

No, we should be working towards more stable alternatives to replace modern renewable energy

 @997L8JJNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

The federal government should get into the energy production business as a genuine competitor.

 @98XT5XBNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes but do it while also improving successful existing infrastructures like nuclear

 @8V76GNDNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Subsidies for homeowners to make better use of renewable resources, greening of homes and building or retrofitting homes to improve energy efficiency and independence from the public power grid, and individual producer opportunities to feed back into the grid

 @8W7KTX2New Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

they should use it more and make it more affordable for low income people.

 @8QQZPGVConservativefrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, the government should subsidize the added cost of renewable energy sources as an incentive program.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...