Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
@8SXWSLJNew Democratic4yrs4Y
@93D3NW63yrs3Y
Yes, but not until fossil fuels have been phased out with nuclear. Renewables alone are not a solution, and should not be treated as such.
@929F59GNew Democratic3yrs3Y
Production if stansards are high, reasonable alternatives. Consumption should be subsidizeled in ant case
@8YVXXCP3yrs3Y
this has no affect on me
@8VQB6WYNew Democratic4yrs4Y
@8VLTRHB4yrs4Y
Yes and help the smaller producers
@8VLM6Y64yrs4Y
yes , but keep oil and gas
@8V894HKNew Democratic4yrs4Y
Yes but only if government gets equivalent stake in the businesses it subsidized
@8V7D7L34yrs4Y
No, they should investigate and support whatever carbon neutral energy production is sensible (i.e. nuclear and/or renewables)
@8V5NFQCNew Democratic4yrs4Y
Only if these renewable energy sources for not effect the water.
@8V59VL54yrs4Y
depends on what that would take money away from
@8V4V4PF4yrs4Y
Renewable energy's like solar and wind are often more polluting over their whole life cycle, from production to disposal, than oil energy sources
@8V28JMZNew Democratic4yrs4Y
I think that have lower costs for renewable energy sources and taxing things that heavily use fossil fuels would increase the amount of individuals, companies, and buildings who would use renewable energy.
@8V23KN6New Democratic4yrs4Y
Yes, but only hydropower, geothermal, and nuclear
@8TYYJTRNew Democratic4yrs4Y
Yes but with much a more refined definition of what it will subsidize and what it will not.
@8TYXSVHNew Democratic4yrs4Y
Yes, but only subsidize hydropower, geothermal, and nuclear.
@8TX64S4New Democratic4yrs4Y
Yes, specifically for nuclear power
@8TQTW27New Democratic4yrs4Y
Yes, and nationalize the industry
@8PZSNFTNew Democratic4yrs4Y
Yes, but only for untested technologies.
@8P9P9VYNew Democratic4yrs4Y
if the amount of renewable energy increases than thousands of canadians could lose their jobs
@8NS8DTXNew Democratic4yrs4Y
The federal government should subsidize nuclear power.
@8LBMBSG4yrs4Y
Yes, if the government can set up a good system for immediate and local usage of said sources and do so without upsetting local groundwater
@8KG9P6D4yrs4Y
I am uneducated on this issue and need to learn more about it before I can give a clear, thoughtful answer.
@8DDJKTQ5yrs5Y
we should have no companies and just put hose power sources in control of workers
@8CDRYPTNew Democratic5yrs5Y
They should definitely support this industry
@99KVJHQNew Democratic2yrs2Y
I'd rather have more options available for energy, including the government.
@99HH6R5New Democratic2yrs2Y
No, we should be working towards more stable alternatives to replace modern renewable energy
@997L8JJNew Democratic2yrs2Y
The federal government should get into the energy production business as a genuine competitor.
@98XT5XBNew Democratic2yrs2Y
Yes but do it while also improving successful existing infrastructures like nuclear
@98TXPTX2yrs2Y
Nationalize green energy
@98FHC732yrs2Y
Nationalise the production of renewable energy sources.
@98DXRC22yrs2Y
Subsidize? Nah bro, NATIONALIZE!!!
@8V76GNDNew Democratic4yrs4Y
Subsidies for homeowners to make better use of renewable resources, greening of homes and building or retrofitting homes to improve energy efficiency and independence from the public power grid, and individual producer opportunities to feed back into the grid
@8W7KTX2New Democratic4yrs4Y
they should use it more and make it more affordable for low income people.
@8QQZPGVConservative4yrs4Y
Yes, the government should subsidize the added cost of renewable energy sources as an incentive program.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.