Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
@92TDGFR3yrs3Y
Subsidized at a rate that promotes slow, progressive development towards a more sustainable energy resource without cutting off oil and gas.
@8VQB6WYNew Democratic4yrs4Y
@8VJC5F54yrs4Y
Yes, unless the renewable sources is totally unfeasible (ie. ethanol)
@8V8T75M4yrs4Y
Yes, at least temporarily or until renewables become competitive with fossil fuels
@8TKFPRH4yrs4Y
Yes, and the government should work towards prohibiting the expansion of non-renewable energy sources.
@8SJ3CVL4yrs4Y
I need to do more research on the topic
@8S3NTLN4yrs4Y
yes for non worker co-ops
@8R4BJY34yrs4Y
yes but at a certain percentage for each individual item
@8LPJ2TF4yrs4Y
I dont have enough information on the subject.
@8D76F325yrs5Y
They should at least help
@99KVJHQNew Democratic2yrs2Y
I'd rather have more options available for energy, including the government.
@97WJT8Y2yrs2Y
The Federal Government should nationalize ALL Energy Production
Yes the government should as long as it works from a capitalist view
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
