Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
@9GPTJ2D1yr1Y
No, producers of non-renewable energy sources should be taxed to incentivize them to transition to the production of renewable energy sources.
@9GNXXXT1yr1Y
We can certainly help with grants in the national interest, to expand renewable energy and make it more accessible for businesses.
@92NSVSP3yrs3Y
Certainly. We need research and development to be made on different types of renewable power and electricity, to help solve climate change.
@8ZRFPJK3yrs3Y
Yes, with the exception of bio-diesel subsidies, which are a net negative.
@8V6C5CN4yrs4Y
Possibly depending on what it is and how it impacts the deficit on Canadians.
@8V672JY4yrs4Y
Yes, but our first priority should be drastically reducing our national budget deficit
@8TXYQNN4yrs4Y
Shouldn't be dependent on a single source of energy. Green energy is not really green.
i think the government should make everyone consume renewable vape sources
@9BK2RQ62yrs2Y
Yes, we need this if we want businesses to develop in a positive way forward.
@99K3PVR2yrs2Y
Yes, we should. It's in our national interest to develop energy independence, as well as continue our power as a lead exporter of energy, whether it be in oil and gas, and natural resource development, or exporting renewable tech to other nations. It's also good for us to develop it as it can show the world the potential that it has.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
