Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
@9FC3VVH2yrs2Y
Yes, but only if it’s in our budget
@9DZPXF52yrs2Y
Nuclear is good, solar is ok, but not wind
@9TGBW8CConservative7mos7MO
No, because there is no adequate renewable energy source that will sufficiently supply the country as well as oil and gas.
@96N6ZCV2yrs2Y
Depends on the recourse cost to make said energy source
@8VRH9N64yrs4Y
They should not use as many un renewable resources
@8VR79MX4yrs4Y
Yes, by offering private citizens (e.g., homeowners) and businesses to be able to produce renewable energy at a similar cost to current energy prices.
@8VJ5W9R4yrs4Y
Yes, but only if the renewable energy source isn't actually harmful to the environment after the fact
@8TX64S4New Democratic4yrs4Y
Yes, specifically for nuclear power
@8T9NK7D4yrs4Y
They should encourage it
@99VLQTQ2yrs2Y
The government needs to stop giving money away. The governments money is the tax payers money. Leave more in the hands of the people and let the people take care of it.
@99MR6J32yrs2Y
Yes, if that source has the realistic potential to drastically reinvent how humans operate in the associated department.
@99HH6R5New Democratic2yrs2Y
No, we should be working towards more stable alternatives to replace modern renewable energy
@8QXPBDW4yrs4Y
Minimal Subsidizes only.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
