Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
@9623N533yrs3Y
subsidize production but not consumption
@92TDGFR3yrs3Y
Subsidized at a rate that promotes slow, progressive development towards a more sustainable energy resource without cutting off oil and gas.
@8VQB6WYNew Democratic4yrs4Y
Nationalize the Energy enterprises to start the production of renewable energy sources and phase our Fossil fuels.
@8VBYJJ84yrs4Y
If it’s truly beneficial
@8V8T75M4yrs4Y
Yes, at least temporarily or until renewables become competitive with fossil fuels
@8TVCWD64yrs4Y
Yes, and the means should be nationalized.
@8TKFPRH4yrs4Y
Yes, and the government should work towards prohibiting the expansion of non-renewable energy sources.
@8S3NTLN4yrs4Y
yes for non worker co-ops
@8NWN2VM4yrs4Y
Yes, as long as not only rich are able to take advantage of the subsidies
@9CG2JV42yrs2Y
Federal or Provinicial governments should be the power suppliers - no private industry generation/ownership. Essential services should be government owned and operated.
@99DZSDS2yrs2Y
No the government should subsidize the production and consumption of nuclear and Hydro-electric energy instead of wind a solar energy
@98T57V82yrs2Y
Yes, but not for the profit of large companies
@98HXPMV2yrs2Y
No, the energy sector should be able to run its self without government involvement.
@97WJT8Y2yrs2Y
The Federal Government should nationalize ALL Energy Production
Yes the government should as long as it works from a capitalist view
@nnekascott4yrs4Y
Yes, and the government should nationalize all energy production
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
