Should the government subsidize home buyers who make less than $120K per year?

in specific surcomestances familys should get help from schools and the government in order to survive

Should be lowered to $100,000

The government should instead introduced policies to prevent skyrocketing housing prices

Regardless, the government should gain ownership of all houses/apartment buildings, distribute it equally with accommodations for needed space, and make it free. Housing is a human right.

Yes, for Canadian born citizens. Take care of your own first and foremost.

homes should be affordable to everybody and there should be some kind of inspection to show how much your home is actually worth instead of everyone being selfish when they sell their homes for much more than they are worth.

social housing

More housing should be created

Only if the person who needs finacial support has been looking for a better job, and working hard.

bgkjbhbhuiuohhjbibihihuhyuiyuhy8g7gy7gy7gy7gy8gy8iguyftft67ttfr6tr6ddctyft7t868ctydcdty6aerwaersftgchgcfgxfdrtfdthuycgb fhgrtf6yhtre5ydtrtf

Yes however we should also look at more affordable land options and zoning laws that ban tiny homes as this could be an affordable alternative for many people and allow people of any income level to have a shelter or easily subsidized by the government.

Yes, but the amount subsidized be based off the house prices within the province.

no, I think that the government should subsidize people who make less than 100k a year

Base it off of help from family, including inheritance

Subsidize home buyers who make less than $60k

Yes as long as they are working toward getting a higher paying job.

Yes, but at this point in the economy, the minimum amount people need to make to get help should be raised. A combined family income of $120k is not enough to buy a house on their own. The government should also limit the number of homes that can be bought by a single person or corporation.

Yes, but for those making less than $75K

No, the government should limit number of homes that can be bought by a single person or corporation

No, they should make housing more affordable instead

Foreign ownership should be banned

I'm unsure, but housing needs to be more affordable.

Housing needs to be de-commodified entirely. Social housing is the way.

No, rent support and building high quality state housing in urban centres is a more effective means of eliminating housing shortages without increasing future inequality (mortgage supports historically entrench hereditary wealth gaps between those who do and don’t receive them due to hereditary property transmission)

Uneversal Housing should happen instead

Yes, but the qualification must be very specific.

Yes but proportionally to median incomes in each province

No. New home production should be increased, foreign buyers should be taxed, unoccupied homes should be heavily taxed, the number of properties and the absolute square footage of land owned by a person or corporation should be limited.

ban bidding wars. no home should sell for more than its current worth, not hundreds of thousands over. stop blind bidding. make current home owners pay higher down payments. the more homes they own, the higher the down payment. proof of where money has come from to prevent homes neing bought with dirty money. eliminate, or hugely reduce payouts to share holders where corporate ownership is concerned. getting rid down payments all together for first time buyers. making interest higher buyers buying 2nd+ homes. interest should be higher with each new property. make tenancy act more in favour of tenents to discourage slumlord investing.

Yes, if they are first-time home buyers.

Should be allowed less of a downpayment. Or given interest free loan for downpayment if they have a good credit history.

yes but lower the 120k by quite a lot so it’s only going to those who are seriously in need

Housing for people making under $70k should be more accessible

Make land ownership limited to Canadian Citizens only

Yes, but there should be an application process to receive these fundings, and requirements.

Yes, but for buyers who make less than $80k per year.

Rent caps should be initiated so people can afford to live

Yes, and the government should provide more funding to develop more affordable housing

No, but should soft cap real estate prices

Yes and limit the number homes that can be bought and lower the cost to buy a home.

Yes, but the government should make housing more affordable for both renters and home buyers by increasing the supply of housing units through direct funding of their construction

we shouldnt have to pay for houses bruh

I'm honestly confused by the question

Government should address the causes for the rising housing prices.

There should be a more progressive land tax to stop property hoarding.

what does subsidize mean

We need more subsidized, affordable, rent controlled rental properties in Canada for those who simply will never be able to purchase a property. Our system is biased towards ownership. That is backwards, narrow-minded thinking.

They should provide a head start to for first time home buyers to get into the market but I don't think they should be given a full grant every time.

Yes, although how it is given out should be determined on individual financial status and the amount of dependants that the home buyers have.

Yes, if they make less than $45K per year.

No, that would raise home prices.

Yes but it depends on the local housing market.

if the person has a large family and is raising kids on his/her own then yes.

It depends of if they are on assisted living, above or below poverty line, and a few other factors. it honestly depends on the situation.

you mean - *who make less than $60K per year. - $120K per year is Rich. those people do not need subsidies. If you think that $120K per year is poor, than you are part of the problem.

Depends on income

They should cut their taxes and make housing more affordable for poorer buyers, and get the money from taxing the rich

120k is too high a number

they should help people that need a home and who are living homeless and in shelters instead.

I think the government should subsidize those who make much less than that. There should be a percentage calculation dependent on the income of the individual and how many people they support in their household.

no opinions

There should be prevention of foreign buyers buying homes that are not lived in. And more affordable housing.

Yes, but not 120 k maybe 80 k

It should mainly depend on how many people are living with you, your bills, and how many people you are regularly financially supporting.

it depends on how much less than $120K it is like if they work a minimum wage job.

Yes but only first time home buyers

everyone should get what they need contribute what they can and if we have more than needed give them more

Yes, but the government should limit the amount of houses they can subsidize for an individual (the individual can still buy more houses but the government will not subsidize)

No, but bring down house prices through other means, i.e. building more affordable homes.

yes if neccessary but they should lower the prices of homes if possible

This cap should be raised as cost of living has drastically increased

No, and the government should limit the number of homes that can be bought by...

I don't have much of an opinion about this, it depends on a lot, how any kids you have, if you are in a relationship with someone who makes more or less, etc.

Yes, and landlords should be abolished

Yes, and also increase the cost of housing

We are the ones who pay for systems like this

Governments should set the rules that make home or land ownership possible without competing with corporations or wealthy individuals. Governments should put ceilings on dwelling rental rates that keep these rates balanced with income averages.

Yes, but they should only subsidize buyers who make less than 100K

Yes, and tax foreign buyers and housing speculators to pay for it.

Yes only if there aren't selling restrictions on the first home. There can be selling restrictions on the 2nd and 3rd homes. This will promote more economic mobility between the bracket.

under 67,000

not 120k but more so familys under 70k

Yes but with a lower minimum annual income

The government should fund public housing and housing co-ops

No, but more low-income housing options should be funded.