Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
Province/Territory:
@96R332N2yrs2Y
If the owners of said property allow it and if allowed get paid compensation
@9388XWJ3yrs3Y
ask local comunities and experts
@8VQJCS54yrs4Y
Yes, if the owner consents
@8VJXJ2SConservative4yrs4Y
Yes but only IF the land owner agrees to sell the land. If not then they have to move the layout of the pipeline
@8VCMQ8P4yrs4Y
Yes. As long as the landowner agrees to sell
@8V72WKCConservative4yrs4Y
Re-route, private companies should not be able to expropriate land or private property
@8TZZQVJ4yrs4Y
No, expropriation should be illegal
@8T38T49Conservative4yrs4Y
As long as the landowners agree
@8F3PG2ZConservative5yrs5Y
Yes, with excellent compensation to land owners, transparency, flawless quality control, and rerouting to avoid any vulnerable environments.
@97T4JZCConservative2yrs2Y
If landowners are fairly compensated, first nations are consulted. i would prefer renewables or LNG pipelines, but for temporary or economic success, I could see it as necessary
@97N57G3Conservative2yrs2Y
No. Come up with a plan with the people living in those communities that everyone agrees on before continuing with work on the pipelines. When done right the pipelines can be a really great opporitunity for a lot of people in Canada
@8P9YHMH4yrs4Y
No, but they can if the landowners or people agree with the pipeline and think if is good for the environment.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
