Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionsDomestic PolicyStarted 13yrs agoActive 9hrs ago3 here now

Should there be more restrictions on the current process of purchasing a gun?

The 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings caused several states and cities to pass strict gun control measures. In response, state lawmakers in gun friendly states in the South and West passed bills that would strengthen Stand Your Ground laws and allow weapons in most public places. In 2014, 21 states passed laws that expanded the rights of gun owners allowing them to possess firearms in churches, bars, schools and college campuses. The federal government has not passed any gun control measures since the 1994 Brady Bill and 42 states now allow the possession of assault rifles. In the U.S. two-thirds of all gun deaths are suicides and in 2010 there were 19,000 firearm suicides and 11,000 firearm homicides.

+
Expand
+ Settings

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Ideology:

Political party:

Political theme:

Province/Territory:

Electoral District (2011):

Electoral District (2013):

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of Gun Control

@9VWM59X
#1 Engaged Voter
@9ZPX698
#2 Engaged Voter
Test Your Knowledge

288 Replies

 @967DL2Jfrom Manitoba  answered…3yrs3Y

No only for assault weapons and people with bad backgrounds

 @8WSJ49Hfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

give out free guns

 @8VL8R75from Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Remove all weapon laws period. If it isn't a torture method, it should be legal

 @8Q8473VConservativefrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Canadian gun owners are already the most vetted in the world. Our gun laws are strictly enough No, and the government should pass a national “stand your ground” law

 @8NWB7PXfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

No remove all gun laws and make it a right under constitution.

 @99PWRSHLiberalfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

The process of attaining a firearm is already strong enough. there should be less restrictions on what firearms can be purchased to licensed carriers.

 @8V4M9G4from British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

The government is wildly incompetent and it gets worse as it grows. They lose more firearms than the population.

 @8TY9M7Rfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Only for prohibited weapons. Hunting rifles should remain the same.

 @8T865ZXfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

The recent restrictions with fire arms are unnecessary and they should enhance background checks and also do a psyc test before the purchase of a fire arm

 @88LK76J from Michigan  answered…4yrs4Y

No all gun control laws must be abolished except for age restrictions

 @88LK76J from Michigan  answered…4yrs4Y

No all gun control laws must be abolished except for age restrictions.

 @8M64XKW from Georgia  answered…4yrs4Y

No, gun laws are unconstitutional, and most that we have need to be repealed.

 @88LK76J from Michigan  answered…4yrs4Y

No all gun control laws must be abolished except for adult age restrictions.

 @88LK76J from Michigan  answered…4yrs4Y

No guns should only be restricted to adults only

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…5mos5MO

Kamala Harris is considering running for president again in 2028

Kamala Harris has been lying low since her defeat in the presidential race, unwinding with family and senior aides in Hawaii before heading back to the nation’s capital.But privately, the vice president has been instructing advisers and allies to keep her options open — whether for a possible 2028 presidential run, or even to run for governor in her home state of California in two years. As Harris has repeated in phone calls, “I am staying in the fight.”She is expected to explore those and other possible paths forward with family members over the winter holiday season, according to five people in the Harris inner circle, who were granted anonymity to discuss internal dynamics. Her deliberations follow an extraordinary four months in which Harris went from President Joe Biden’s running mate to the top of the ticket, reenergizing Democrats before ultimately crashing on election night.“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”Harris concedes: 'We must accept the results of this election'SharePlay VideoMost immediately, Harris and her advisers are working to define how and when she will speak out against Donald Trump and reassert her own role in the Democratic Party. Closing out her term as vice president, she’s set to preside over certifying the November election she lost to Trump, and then appear at the once-and-future president’s inauguration on Jan. 20.“There will be a desire to hear her voice, and there won’t be a vacuum for long,” a person close to Harris said.At the same time, Harris and her husband, Doug Emhoff, will have a long checklist to plow through before they leave the Naval Observatory for good.They have to decide whether they’ll take up permanent residence at their home in Los Angeles, or establish a base elsewhere. No matter where Harris and her family live, some around her have expressed concerns about safety, as her Secret Service protection expires six months after stepping away.

▲  1023 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…5mos5MO

Rashida Tlaib calls On Blinken to Resign Over Gaza war

A US congresswoman urged Secretary of State Antony Blinken to resign for not changing the policy on arms supply to Israel."Secretary Blinken exposed his lie by announcing that there will be no change to any policy, despite admitting that the Israeli government has still failed to comply with all of their demands."Secretary Blinken has continued to lie to Congress and should resign," Rashida Tlaib said on the floor of the House of Representatives.Her remarks came after the State Department said Tuesday that the US would not change its policy on arms transfers to Israel even though the humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip remains dire.A deadline was set by Washington in an Oct. 13 letter for Israel to ramp up access to aid within 30 days in the besieged Palestinian enclave or risk US military aid.Tlaib said the Biden administration continues to ignore reports that Israel is blocking humanitarian aid into Gaza in violation of US and international law."The Israeli government is using starvation as a weapon of war," she said, showing a picture of a starving child."US law is very clear: No nation blocking US humanitarian assistance can receive US weapons. The Biden administration cannot pick and choose when they comply with our own laws."Children are forced to eat pet food and bug-infested flour, look at this and do not turn your back on again, being complicit to this war crime, but Blinken says there's no need to change our own policy. Shameful!" she added.Eight humanitarian aid organizations said in a statement that Israel has failed to meet the criteria set out by the US to improve the humanitarian situation in Gaza.Israel has continued its devastating offensive against Gaza since a cross-border attack by the Palestinian resistance group, Hamas, on Oct. 7, 2023. The onslaught has killed more than 43,700 people and rendered the enclave almost uninhabitable.Israel faces a genocide case at the International Court of Justice for its deadly war on Gaza.

▲  56 replies