Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political theme:
Electoral District (2011):
These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of Public Transportation
@B4F9SGD2wks2W
No, for public transportation. However, funding should be increased only for the disabled transportation, as there are long wait times. A lot of them spend all day just waiting around to be picked up and dropped off for appointments and this is unacceptable.
@9J3WNSP1yr1Y
Yes, but with hightened accountability and in conjunction with other infrastructure programs for achieving a long-term state, and that has to be defined.
@8VSKG6T4yrs4Y
Yes, but includes continued improvements to highways and roadways for vehicular traffic
@8TX7JTCConservative4yrs4Y
If the transit and their contractors will stick to the schedules and plans... yes... but prolong it, it’ll cause great deficits...
@8SFT94R4yrs4Y
I don't live where there is any so it dosen't affect me
@8PDVP3G4yrs4Y
They should provide free public transportation while working toward environmentally friendly solutions.
yes, but only if we truly need it
@97NRTW82yrs2Y
Spending needs to come from the municipalities themselves. With support at the provincial level when needed.
@9CMTQ992yrs2Y
Yes, and provide more free public transportation and increase security on public transit for protection and safety.
@9CMTQB32yrs2Y
Yes, and have more security in public transit for safety/protection.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
