Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of Public Transportation

100 Replies

 @9VW5KW2Conservativefrom British Columbia  answered…6mos6MO

It depends, I think densification of cities and towns would make increased public transit more feasible in Canada. Until then public transport is not a great means of transportation.

 @9VG7P4VConservativefrom British Columbia  answered…6mos6MO

Yes, by adding more routes and hours of service. We don't live in a 9-5 society anymore and our public transportation should reflect that

 @9K3JWDFPeople’sfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Some public buses are missing in Canada they never come to yhe bus stop as shown in the google map so i think you should spend money on buses more.

 @9JRD5WLConservativefrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Depending on what they use the money for. If they start using it for environmentally friendly transportation then no. But if it is used to create more highways, busses running on gas and to keep it all clean then yes.

 @9HXJPJSChristian Heritagefrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

We should build train tracks to open up the Country. Rail transport should take priority over road transportation

 @9HQ5ZCKPeople’sfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

I think the opposite. No child should be needing to pay for transportation unless we're old enough to get a G1 at the moment,

 @9GYC866Conservativefrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

The government if they had extra money after upgrading infrastructure they should put it into public transport

 @9FDLC9KConservativefrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

No, unless the government builds bullet trains from Windsor to Quebec City.

 @9MCJ3PYConservativefrom Ontario  answered…11mos11MO

It really depends because yes we can have more public transit like rentable e bikes and scooters but we already have buses and bikes so why waste the money when it could go to housing

 @9LFH2B9Conservativefrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

spending should be higher as distance decreases until you want to go outside the city in order to encourage private transportation

 @9D5WBPDConservativefrom Nova Scotia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @8ZHV85NConservativefrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VW6JQVConservativefrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8VW5FBZConservativefrom Manitoba  answered…4yrs4Y

Government should invest in public transportation projects that are budget friendly, efficient and worth it to do it.

 @8V5QR4YConservativefrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes and provide funding to help rural communities with transportation to help increase employment opportunities.

 @8TX7JTCConservativefrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

If the transit and their contractors will stick to the schedules and plans... yes... but prolong it, it’ll cause great deficits...

 @8TTNR44Conservativefrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Any and all busing that pertains to elementary, middle & secondary should be free as it use to be for many years

 @8QZF8Q4Conservativefrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8PV677JConservativefrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Make a functional public transit system but keep the fees because my city does not have a system that is very usable

 @8NW2GMYConservativefrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8KM3KK6Conservativefrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Public Transportation should be as efficient as possible while also being free to the greater public

 @8G4D2W5Conservativefrom British Columbia  answered…5yrs5Y

No, and current spending should be diverted to energy and environmentally friendly solutions.

 @9C3WD8BConservative from Maine  answered…2yrs2Y

Increase security and give passes to low income families with facial I'd to protect stealing passes.

 @8DMQCCPConservativefrom Ontario  answered…5yrs5Y

I believe it is dependent on the city and how sustainable the solutions are

 @9C7VHL9Conservativefrom Saskatchewan  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, especially for the school buses, as currently, they have hardly changed for decades and I think they should be more comfortable. (Rural)

 @99F8TDHConservativefrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, and provide more free public transportation, and prioritize the safety and security of paying passengers.

 @98ZSBHNConservativefrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

Only in densely populated areas where data has shown a lack of sufficient public transit

 @97T4JZCConservativefrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but handled through provincial or local governments, and spending for environmentally friendly solutions

 @8FCYBSYanswered…5yrs5Y

If only people start to take care of what is given to them to help them.

 @8CV6FZ5 from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

 @7C3ZZ8M from Minnesota  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only by reallocating funds from other government expenses, whether that would be from military, medicare, social security, etc, but not in an excessive amount to where it dramatically impacts those categories.

 @7GP32QV from California  answered…4yrs4Y

 @7GP32QV from California  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8H72GPZ from Arizona  answered…5yrs5Y

Public transportation funding needs to come from the state government because needs are different in each state.

 @8VJQ9QW from Ohio  answered…3yrs3Y

 @928JSGK from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8PH5546 from Arizona  answered…4yrs4Y

 @kaparker from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only to low income areas or particularly in need of public transportation

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...