Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political theme:
Electoral District (2011):
These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of Public Transportation
Make it free for under 16
They already spend enough money on public transportation and most of the income comes from the government itself in my opinion it should stay as it is.
Yes, provided the costs are put towards improvement and do not fall to the consumer
@9FHCTXZ2yrs2Y
Yes, but only if the spending goes to be more efficient and effective transportation, improving the different transport systems in cities that need it the most.
yes, and provide free transportation(i.e; bus, train ect) for kids under 13 years of age
@9BS794Z2yrs2Y
Yes, and spend more money on police and security for public transit stations.
Yes if it's to reduce cars on the road
@95K5YQG3yrs3Y
Yes, it's clear that Canada's cities are going to need investments in transit, and we're going to need this infrastructure to be built as our planet is warming, and we need to reduce our overall CO2 emissions from transportation as much as possible. EVs and fuel-efficient cars can only do so much, but they don't work for everyone as cars are often a big expense for many people.
Neither. This is not in federal jurisdiction
@923F9N33yrs3Y
No they shouldnt,but make sure to everyonr pay their rent.
Bring the gas price lower, very low
We want a cleaner environment yet millions of people have to drive their kids to school because there is no more school busses That was a very stupid choice to families and the environment
Yes and do it through taxing car sales.
Yes, in order to improve efficiency and capacity
It should be free, the bus driver should be paid a higher wage if the passengers are paying a fee to ride the bus,
@8SG4JCJ4yrs4Y
depending on demands of the consumers
Yes, but make sure that the city also has the funds to meet it's end of the deal, so that the federal government doesn't have to step in as often, although good transit is in the national interest.
@9BN6JRT2yrs2Y
Yes, but with a mandate for effective and professional Program Management and Systems Engineering. Too many projects lost far too much of this money through incompetence (Ottawa LRT, for example).
I'm fine what's going on now, it's just that governments should do a better job of enforcing payment for the transit instead of increasing or decreasing spending.
No, public transportation should be a municipal responsibility
yes, but only if we truly need it
Yes, but only competently and where necessary. Don't spend for the sake of spending
@8F2KYGZ5yrs5Y
Yes, but only where necessary. Do not spend for the sake of spending.
@9CMFTM62yrs2Y
Yes, it should be environmental friendly and provide free public transportation.
Increase spending on highly populated areas
Yes, and maybe make transportation free for the elderly, and the spending gos towards environmentally friendly solutions.
Yes. It's abundantly clear that Canada is going to need more good-quality public transit in the coming years, as our cities will grow but we also need to combat the additional challenges of climate change and rising GHG emissions within cities, which are a problem as most Canadians do live within or just outside of a major city.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
