Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Informed Voters

These active users have achieved an understanding of common concepts and the history regarding the topic of Healthcare Privatization

312 Replies

 @9T5RTV7from Alberta  answered…7mos7MO

I believe that there should more privatized healthcare in order to avoid overcrowding and hopefully allow for faster medical attention, however I also believe that there should be more government funding towards public healthcare in order to ensure that everyone is able to access some form of healthcare if needed, as is a human right.

 @9W4D444from Alberta  answered…6mos6MO

I believe that there should be more privatized healthcare in order to avoid overcrowding and hopefully allow for faster medical attention, however I also believe that there should be more government funding towards public healthcare in order to ensure that everyone is able to access some form of healthcare if needed, as is a human right.

 @9TGC77Mfrom Alberta  answered…7mos7MO

right now there are more benefits to having privatized health care ( ex. Dino care, helps their employment more and has a stable system set, which is more beneficial for both the puplic and the members of emplyment, vs Alberta Health care, cares less about the pateints).

 @9TGBW8CConservativefrom Alberta  answered…7mos7MO

There should be a balance between private and public healthcare. The health care system should give more autonomy to its doctors.

 @9JQK37WConservativefrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

there should be privatization of somesort, but public healthcare should be the priority. Privatization for people who don't want loing wait times, and public for affordable healthcare.

 @8VT96H3from Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Healthcare should be accessible to everyone, funded by government, but private care available for those who are able to pay for it.

 @8VR79MXfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

More, keep current public system but make room for a non-subsidized private system (absolutely 0 government funding other than potentially for strictly research), which can relieve pressure on the public system and provide those with the means to 'skip the line' should they be able to afford it.

 @8VJKZ29from Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Slightly more by allowing the use of private ORs, but still have the surgeries paid for by the government

 @8VJ5W9Rfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8V2QZ84Conservativefrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Allowed for two system to exist if the private system works then it can function on its own with out government funds and must meet or exceed the public systems standards

 @8JZP2HNLiberalfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Continue with public health care, however, have more opportunities for private health care.

 @9C2K6S8from Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

The current system is satisfactory however more government funding is required to make the system more efficient

 @99VLQTQfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

Two tier system allowing those who wish to pay for better Healthcare and less wait time to be able to. The wait times are unreal and shameful.

 @99MR6J3from Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

Maintain the current healthcare system but allow for private hospitals and institutions.

 @B34YX9Nfrom Alberta  answered…2mos2MO

I believe there should be a balance in which individuals who can afford private healthcare services should have the system available, and individuals who can't afford it may have public healthcare services. This system will allow individuals with different financial statuses to benefit even if they are lower income

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...