Privatization is the process of transferring governmental control and ownership of a service or industry to a privately owned business.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
These active users have achieved an understanding of common concepts and the history regarding the topic of Healthcare Privatization
@9T5RTV77mos7MO
I believe that there should more privatized healthcare in order to avoid overcrowding and hopefully allow for faster medical attention, however I also believe that there should be more government funding towards public healthcare in order to ensure that everyone is able to access some form of healthcare if needed, as is a human right.
@9W4D4446mos6MO
I believe that there should be more privatized healthcare in order to avoid overcrowding and hopefully allow for faster medical attention, however I also believe that there should be more government funding towards public healthcare in order to ensure that everyone is able to access some form of healthcare if needed, as is a human right.
@9TGC77M7mos7MO
right now there are more benefits to having privatized health care ( ex. Dino care, helps their employment more and has a stable system set, which is more beneficial for both the puplic and the members of emplyment, vs Alberta Health care, cares less about the pateints).
@9TGBW8CConservative7mos7MO
There should be a balance between private and public healthcare. The health care system should give more autonomy to its doctors.
@9JQK37WConservative1yr1Y
there should be privatization of somesort, but public healthcare should be the priority. Privatization for people who don't want loing wait times, and public for affordable healthcare.
@9FGPFZS2yrs2Y
Government funding with privatization
@8VT96H34yrs4Y
Healthcare should be accessible to everyone, funded by government, but private care available for those who are able to pay for it.
@8VR79MX4yrs4Y
More, keep current public system but make room for a non-subsidized private system (absolutely 0 government funding other than potentially for strictly research), which can relieve pressure on the public system and provide those with the means to 'skip the line' should they be able to afford it.
@8VJKZ294yrs4Y
Slightly more by allowing the use of private ORs, but still have the surgeries paid for by the government
@8VJGXSJConservative4yrs4Y
More and more public funding
@8VJ5W9R4yrs4Y
There needs to be a balanced hybridized system of both
@8V2QZ84Conservative4yrs4Y
Allowed for two system to exist if the private system works then it can function on its own with out government funds and must meet or exceed the public systems standards
Continue with public health care, however, have more opportunities for private health care.
@9C2K6S82yrs2Y
The current system is satisfactory however more government funding is required to make the system more efficient
@99VLQTQ2yrs2Y
Two tier system allowing those who wish to pay for better Healthcare and less wait time to be able to. The wait times are unreal and shameful.
@99MR6J32yrs2Y
Maintain the current healthcare system but allow for private hospitals and institutions.
@B34YX9N2mos2MO
I believe there should be a balance in which individuals who can afford private healthcare services should have the system available, and individuals who can't afford it may have public healthcare services. This system will allow individuals with different financial statuses to benefit even if they are lower income
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.