Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Province/Territory:
Electoral District (2011):
Electoral District (2013):
@B45T6JK4wks4W
Yes, but only for non-essential services And police officers and other essential workers should be paid a lot more
@9WYDMSD6mos6MO
Yes, but establish a labour court to prevent strikes but if workers want to go through with striking it is fully within their right. it is an act of protest and worker solidarity is something we should protect as that is what brings change to society and can help get rid of a horrible government in times of crisis like we have today.
@9TNBDV87mos7MO
Yes, and the right to strike should not be infringed or revoked by governments, arbitrators, or anyone else.
@9GNXXXT1yr1Y
Yes, as it can be a release valve for workers to express frustrations, but there also needs to be a labour court or back to work legislation if the strike gets out of control.
@9FDR25L2yrs2Y
No, but there should be a group of people to listen to their rights and work on it accordingly.
@9DTTBXP2yrs2Y
All people should be allowed to strike but they should maintain a minimal level of service
@945C4M23yrs3Y
Yes, but you've got to have the ability to break up a strike if it gets out of hand.
@93FG53G3yrs3Y
Yes, as there are legitimate concerns that do need to be heard, but some industries are incredibly important and deliver life-saving treatment (nurses, doctors) so we also need to do something about that as well that is in the best interests of both.
@8V3LWHN4yrs4Y
Yes, you should be allowed to strike but not allowed to stop giving services if you’re an essential worker
@8TXVXML4yrs4Y
No, and if it's non-essential, end it.
@997WWFB2yrs2Y
Yes, as it brings attention to underfunded services which might not be politically popular, and help finds political support for it.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
