@ISIDEWITHQuestionstransportationStarted 11mos agoActive 1 day ago1 here now

Should the government prioritize the maintenance and repair of existing roads and bridges over building new infrastructure?

This question considers whether maintaining and repairing current infrastructure should take precedence over constructing new roads and bridges. Proponents argue that it ensures safety, extends the life of existing infrastructure, and is more cost-effective. Opponents argue that new infrastructure is needed to support growth and improve transportation networks.

+
Expand
+ Settings x  Rhinoceros

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 223 Rhinoceros voters.

79%
Yes
21%
No
79%
Yes
21%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 223 Rhinoceros voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 223 Rhinoceros voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Rhinoceros voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @B4TKMPGfrom British Columbia  answered…1 day1D

As long as doing so would not drain our economy due to the rate at which old infrastructures breakdown after being fixed and thus, the need to fix them again

 @B4R3Z5Cfrom British Columbia  answered…5 days5D

Both things are important. New infrastructure should be prioritized except in cases where existing infrastructure has become dangerous when not maintained or repaired.

 @B2W86PRfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

The needs of individual communities need to be considered.

 @B2Q85HWfrom British Columbia  answered…3mos3MO

I dont think they should building road and bridge rather than building, I think they should do both buildings and roads.

 @B2PWNX6from British Columbia  answered…3mos3MO

Yes, but only in regards to vital roads and traffic chokepoints

 @B2PLZ3Yfrom Ontario  answered…3mos3MO

road infrastructure, yes. Transit infrastructure, no.

 @B2LZJBRfrom Quebec  answered…3mos3MO

Both should be equally prioritized, Canada lacks proper and easy transportation especially cross province transports.

 @B2HKYQ8from Alberta  answered…3mos3MO

No, both should be prioritized as needed within an area

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…5mos5MO

Texas Offers Trump 1,400 Acres for His Mass Deportation Dream

Officials in Texas have offered President-elect Trump a 1,400-acre ranch for his mass deportation plan.Dawn Buckingham, land commissioner of the Texas General Land Office, said in a letter to Trump Tuesday that her office was “fully prepared” to work with federal agencies that are going to be involved in Trump’s immigration plan, and specifically deportation.Buckingham offered Trump a 1,402-acre lot in Starr County. The lot is owned by the Texas General Land Office and is roughly 35 miles west of McAllen, Texas.She said the agency is ready to work with the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or the U.S. Border Patrol to build a facility on the land for “the processing, detention, and coordination of the largest deportation of violent criminals in the nation’s history.”“I am committed to using every available means at my disposal to gain complete operational security of our border,” Buckingham wrote.The letter and offering of land were first reported by The Texas Tribune. Last month, the state bought the land along the U.S.-Mexico border and has plans to build a wall.In the letter, Buckingham criticized her predecessor for not allowing a border wall to be built on the property. Those actions “enabled cartel members and violent criminals to sexually abuse migrant women and children on this land,” she said.On Monday, Trump signaled he would declare an immigration national emergency and use military assets to support his mass deportation plan when he returns to office.

▲  1625 replies

Active 2 days ago

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…6mos6MO

Trump’s Puerto Rico Problem Erupts in Pennsylvania: Latino Voters Fire Back

Donald Trump has a serious Puerto Rico problem — in Pennsylvania.Many Puerto Rican voters in the state are furious about racist and demeaning comments delivered at a Trump rally. Some say their dismay is giving Kamala Harris a new opening to win over the state’s Latino voters, particularly nearly half a million Pennsylvanians of Puerto Rican descent.Evidence of the backlash was immediate on Monday: A nonpartisan Puerto Rican group drafted a letter urging its members to oppose Trump on election day. Other Puerto Rican voters were lighting up WhatsApp chats with reactions to the vulgar display and raising it in morning conversations at their bodegas. Some are planning to protest Trump’s rally Tuesday in Allentown, a majority-Latino city with one of the largest Puerto Rican populations in the state.And the arena Trump is speaking at is located in the middle of the city’s Puerto Rican neighborhood.“It’s spreading like wildfire through the community,” said Norberto Dominguez, a precinct captain with the local Democratic party in Allentown, who noted his own family is half Republican and half Democratic voters.“It’s not the smartest thing to do, to insult people — a large group of voters here in a swing state — and then go to their home asking for votes,” Dominguez said.The timing couldn’t be worse for Trump. Almost a week before Election Day, he’s pushing to cut into Harris’ margins among Latinos, especially young men who are worried about the economy. But the comments from pro-Trump comedian Tony Hinchcliffe Sunday night, referring to Puerto Rico as a “floating island of garbage,” has reverberated throughout Pennsylvania and elsewhere, prompting even the former president’s Republican allies to defend the island and denounce the comments. And with the race essentially a toss up, every vote counts — especially in Pennsylvania.“This was just like a gift from the gods,” said Victor Martinez, an Allentown resident who owns the Spanish language radio station La Mega, noting some Puerto Rican voters in the area have been on the fence about voting at all.

▲  3117 replies