This question considers whether maintaining and repairing current infrastructure should take precedence over constructing new roads and bridges. Proponents argue that it ensures safety, extends the life of existing infrastructure, and is more cost-effective. Opponents argue that new infrastructure is needed to support growth and improve transportation networks.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Ideology
Province/Territory
Response rates from 394 Left voters.
74% Yes |
26% No |
74% Yes |
26% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 394 Left voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 394 Left voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Left voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZMYFJW3 days3D
Depending on the area and need to follow the growing population
@9ZKXQXW7 days7D
They should be investing in both old and new infrastructure
@9ZJDSY71wk1W
I believe both are equally important. We need new infrastructure, and we have to keep the old infrastructure in good enough shape for people to access what they need.
@9V36WR92mos2MO
if the road is really bad yes but if we need those buildings prioritize those
@9TYS4TJ2mos2MO
Existing and new infrastructure are equally important
@9TPPX3Q2mos2MO
No, prioritize building of publicly owned and publicly delivered mass transit.
@9TD45D92mos2MO
both are as important one cannot be prioritized over the other
@9TB785R2mos2MO
Yes and no. If the road is in desperate need of repairs then they should prioritize fixing the so no cars are damage. If the roads are in need of small repairs the they can work on them but mainly focus on building new infrastructures..
Join in on the most popular conversations.
