Incentives could include financial support or tax breaks for developers to build housing that is affordable for low- and middle-income families. Proponents argue that it increases the supply of affordable housing and addresses housing shortages. Opponents argue that it interferes with the housing market and can be costly for taxpayers.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Political party
Province/Territory
Response rates from 273 British Columbia voters.
89% Yes |
11% No |
89% Yes |
11% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 273 British Columbia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 273 British Columbia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from British Columbia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9T6QRJ92mos2MO
the government should construct and manage affordable housing
@9T2Z7Y53mos3MO
Yes, but the incentives should make sure that developers are only hiring quality workers and building quality homes
@9RC2QHK4mos4MO
Yes, and hold developers accountable for changes to their 'affordable housing plans' when they accept provincial subsidies.
@9WQY7BP4wks4W
No, it should expropriate private land and construct prefabricated housing directly
@9WQY7BP4wks4W
No, it should expropriate private land and construct housing directly
@9W8J6361mo1MO
No, under the assumption the government has subsidized and built affordable houses already- first time home buyers only need government incentives because they are barred from the market
@9W4LHPN1mo1MO
No, and restrict the purchase price per unit for developers.
@9W2L82R1mo1MO
A defined % of every housing project should be affordable. The large buildings are profitable or they would not be built. The greed on housing has reached the tipping point
Join in on the most popular conversations.
