These subsidies are financial aids from the government to help individuals purchase their first home, making homeownership more accessible. Proponents argue that it helps people afford their first home and promotes homeownership. Opponents argue that it distorts the housing market and could lead to higher prices.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Political party
Province/Territory
Response rates from 266 Alberta voters.
80% Yes |
20% No |
80% Yes |
20% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 266 Alberta voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 266 Alberta voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Alberta voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B46V7MR4wks4W
No, because the bulk of the recipients are foreign born. 44% of the people within Canada are either foreign born or first generation. I would prefer to see incentives for married Canadian couples to have more children, and subsidies for rural living (including food and energy production) than facilitate first time home buyers
@B43N69X1mo1MO
No, should increase education in financial management and deter people from buying a house and become house poor.
@B3YW9621mo1MO
No, because housing should be affordable on its own. Housing will be very affordable when we deport 10-15 million people who do not belong here.
@B3W9T5D1mo1MO
Yes, but only if the resale value of the home is reduced by the equivalent of this subsidy indexed to inflation.
@B3QGP691mo1MO
If they need or not is the question depending on their salary per year . And I would prioritize family’s in this situation .
@B2K7BJP3mos3MO
No. Not unless the individual effected has a disability
@B2BM93X3mos3MO
Yes and No, complete tax cuts on first time-home buyers.
@B29PP763mos3MO
I think there should be other programs to help first-time homebuyers but a one time financial aid isn't the solution
Join in on the most popular conversations.