This policy would limit the amount a CEO can earn compared to the average salary of their employees. Proponents argue that it would reduce income inequality and ensure fairer compensation practices. Opponents argue that it would interfere with business autonomy and could discourage top executive talent.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Ideology
Province/Territory
Response rates from 742 Left voters.
76% Yes |
24% No |
76% Yes |
24% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 742 Left voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 742 Left voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Left voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B4GKHPS2wks2W
No, that is the responsibility of representation by unions and employees. Not an issue of the government
@B3XK2RM1mo1MO
It depends on the company and what the CEO actually does. Do they pay their employees a fair living wage? If so, no. If employees are not paid well, then yes
@B36H68H2mos2MO
No but we need new mechanisms for making capitalism work for all. There is too much pay inequality and unions are not the answer.
@B2R667B3mos3MO
No, we shouldn't disincentivize building businesses.
@B24CC9Q4mos4MO
Yes but depends on the size of the cap and the market cap of the company as well as employment numbers
@9TTLXGX7mos7MO
not a cap but a ratio since the CEO is taking a lot more risk than the employees
@9MKYHZ711mos11MO
No, if we raise taxes on the rich then the issue will solve itself
Join in on the most popular conversations.
