In 2011 the level of public spending on the welfare state by the British Government accounted for £113.1 billion, or 16% of government. By 2020 welfare spending will rise to 1/3rd of all spending making it the largest expense followed by housing benefit, council tax benefit, benefits to the unemployed, and benefits to people with low incomes.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Province/Territory
Electoral District (2011)
Response rates from 772 Fiscal Conservatism voters.
14% Fewer |
78% More |
12% Fewer |
62% More |
2% Fewer, and ensure benefits go to those that need it most |
7% More, reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income |
1% Fewer, current benefits do not provide enough support |
5% More, but increase benefits for the elderly and disabled |
3% More, and deny benefits to immigrants |
|
1% More, current benefits should be capped |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 772 Fiscal Conservatism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 772 Fiscal Conservatism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Fiscal Conservatism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9VVH8Q91mo1MO
more, reform the system, those who need assistance do not receive enough to get by, but it is also abused by many. we need to find a way to make sure those who need it, get it, and those who are abusing it, do not continue to do so.
@9SLJBJV3mos3MO
More…but increase for seniors and disabled, as well as supplements a working income (which I believe would encourage feeloaders to get a job…this decreasing the costs of what they would normally get sitting at home).
@9JQ8T5J10mos10MO
Fewer, but ensure the payments are generous enough to help, but low enough to not discourage entry into the workforce.
@9JBTHNJ10mos10MO
Make changes to the system so it is more situational, and will provide adequate help to get them off of welfare in the future.
@9QZCYDN4mos4MO
More, but increase benefits for the elderly and disabled and redeem the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income
@9MZ47BD 6mos6MO
Reform the system to supplement a working income so people's total income (paid work plus welfare) is above the poverty level in whichever city/town they live
@9JWMJCZ 9mos9MO
There shouldn't be any restrictions on those living on welfare by the lawful creed of the knight code.
@9HDNW7D12mos12MO
Leave it at current rates but provide daycare and job training for recipients. It is a temporary solution not a permanent one.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Welfare” news articles, updated frequently.
Join in on the most popular conversations.