Fracking is the process of extracting oil or natural gas from shale rock. Water, sand and chemicals are injected into the rock at high pressure which fractures the rock and allows the oil or gas to flow out to a well. While fracking has significantly boosted oil production, there are environmental concerns that the process is contaminating groundwater. Fracking has been widely used by petroleum in Canada since the 1960s. Critics of fracking say it pollutes underground water supplies with chemicals, releases methane gas into the atmosphere, and can cause seismic activity. Proponents of fracking say it will drop oil and gas prices in Spain and lead to energy independence.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Province/Territory
Electoral District (2011)
Response rates from 6k British Columbia voters.
34% Yes |
66% No |
27% Yes |
53% No |
4% Yes, but increase oversight |
9% No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead |
3% Yes, but not in heavily populated areas |
4% No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 6k British Columbia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 6k British Columbia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from British Columbia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B4NGYDD1wk1W
No, but I understand we need it to a degree. We should look into a more sustainable and affordable energy source, but until then, I understand relying on oil and natural gasses.
@B4D9DQY3wks3W
Well yes and no, Its not good that the environment is getting messed up so nothing can grow but at the same time we do need to have our supply of oil. For the ecomany so I think the overall riding answer is yes.
@B4B6SG73wks3W
Yes with increased oversight, exclusively away from populated areas, and this should only continue until we have other energy resources that we can use instead (would also accept if we discovered ways that significantly decreased environmental impact).
@B48NXNX4wks4W
Yes as an inmidiate need, but only with heavy oversight and in areas away from heavily populated areas. However we should try and move away from that.
@B43GQ8Q1mo1MO
No, it should only be used if absolutely necessary, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead
@B37ZT5N2mos2MO
Don't like it. but! until we have more technology and infrastructure in place so we can move away from this, it is sadly a necessary evil.
@9ZNXRCY5mos5MO
Yes, but increase oversight, and continue research on more sustainable energy resources along with measuring the long term effects of fracking.
@9WYDMSD6mos6MO
Yes, just away from populated areas, public water infrastructure and fresh water sources. we also need to ensure maintainence for those sights even if they get closed down to prevent the overflow of those contaminates from leaking into the ground.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Fracking” news articles, updated frequently.
Join in on the most popular conversations.