Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 5.1k Lethbridge 147-1 voters.
81% Yes |
15% No |
71% Yes |
13% No |
4% Yes, but only when a high cost threshold is exceeded |
2% No, we cannot afford to add this at the moment |
3% Yes, but only for low income families |
|
2% Yes, cover the overall prescription costs but have the patient pay the pharmacy dispensing costs |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 5.1k Lethbridge 147-1 voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 5.1k Lethbridge 147-1 voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Lethbridge 147-1 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9WYDMSD3wks3W
we should go a step further and nationalize the production of all medicine and provide it to people completely free, doing so would be significantly cheaper than the current system we have now where we subsidize the majority cost of prescriptions the government buys from big private pharma companies.
@9F3WXLX1yr1Y
Yes, but allow people to opt out and let private companies compete against each other for lower prices
@9F3KW8B1yr1Y
Yes, for prescriptions essential to health.
@9TRBCV92mos2MO
I think this means it'd make getting prescription harder which is good for the crackheads because it should not be so easy for them but there are also lot of ppl who are relly sick and have to wait for their meds
@9RD923D4mos4MO
Emphasis should be on overall general health. Making sure the healthy food and programs are available and affordable to keep the population healthy
@9RC2Y5X4mos4MO
Only for drugs that people really need, not for drugs that if a person choose to do so could eliminate the use of drugs
@9MKYHZ76mos6MO
Yes, but narcotics and more than several prescriptions per year need to be approved by a board of doctors to prevent misuse
@9GZYG4J1yr1Y
No, instead Privatize healthcare and provide healthcare vouchers and healthcare tax credits for low income individual/families.
Join in on the most popular conversations.