Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 5k Richmond Hill voters.
81% Yes |
16% No |
70% Yes |
14% No |
4% Yes, but only for low income families |
2% No, we cannot afford to add this at the moment |
4% Yes, but only when a high cost threshold is exceeded |
|
3% Yes, cover the overall prescription costs but have the patient pay the pharmacy dispensing costs |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 5k Richmond Hill voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 5k Richmond Hill voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Richmond Hill voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9F7WQT32yrs2Y
were broke becaue of tredeau
@B4SR5552 days2D
yes, but only for prescriptions that are detrimental; antibiotics for infection etc. Not ozempic for weight loss that is not an urgent matter.
@B4RNJZY4 days4D
All provinces have their own drug program, but Canada should pay for all maintenance cancer drugs under universal healthcare.
@B4MZCRF1wk1W
- yes, but those bringing in an income of ie 120k + should be purchasing their own.
- yes, and government needs to enact laws that require businesses to have benefit coverage, including the part time employees, when companies started working in that loophole to stop having full time workers to avoid paying benefits!!!
@B4HZF6D2wks2W
Yes if medications are needed to maintain their health and are expensive such as diabetes medications.
@B46NKYC4wks4W
Yes, but doctors are more strict when handing out prescriptions. So drug users aren't getting access to easy prescription drugs
@B3W9T5D1mo1MO
Yes, and enact a single drug insurer as a price negotiation body and launch a drug value assessment agency
@9GPVK6G1yr1Y
yes only when it is a high cost, they require the prescription to maintain their health and they cannot afford it
Join in on the most popular conversations.
